- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- SuperDLT on a K-class server?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-18-2002 05:59 AM
11-18-2002 05:59 AM
SuperDLT on a K-class server?
Any help would be appreciated?
Thanks,jls
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-18-2002 06:08 AM
11-18-2002 06:08 AM
Re: SuperDLT on a K-class server?
You can use a SDLT but need a specific patch.
For 11.0 --> PHKL_27303
For 10.2 --> PHKL_27304
Good luck.
Emiel
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-18-2002 06:14 AM
11-18-2002 06:14 AM
Re: SuperDLT on a K-class server?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-18-2002 06:47 AM
11-18-2002 06:47 AM
Re: SuperDLT on a K-class server?
I will get the PHKL_27303 patch to see if that fixes my problem.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-18-2002 07:01 AM
11-18-2002 07:01 AM
Re: SuperDLT on a K-class server?
As far as I know, SDLT drives are LVD only, so no matter what patch you install, it cannot be directly connected to a K-Class server, which only supports HVD SCSI.
HTH,
Vince
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-18-2002 07:16 AM
11-18-2002 07:16 AM
Re: SuperDLT on a K-class server?
I suggest you remove the SDLT drive from the K-Class immeidately, since LVD (Low Voltage Differential) works on a different voltage than HVD (High Voltage Differential), which could damage your drive/SCSI HBA.
If you REALLY want to get a SDLT to work on a K-class, you should buy an HVD-to-LVD converter. www.paralan.com offers such converter.
HTH,
Vince
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-18-2002 07:51 AM
11-18-2002 07:51 AM
Re: SuperDLT on a K-class server?
I would think somone out there has a SDLT drive connected to their HP9000 server?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-19-2002 08:58 AM
11-19-2002 08:58 AM
Re: SuperDLT on a K-class server?
tar "seems" to work, but I can't be sure it will ALWAYS work.
I guess nobody else is using SDLT on HP servers. That's too bad...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-19-2002 11:39 AM
11-19-2002 11:39 AM
Re: SuperDLT on a K-class server?
HTH
Marty
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-21-2002 02:52 AM
11-21-2002 02:52 AM
Re: SuperDLT on a K-class server?
Nice to know that Quantum still makes HVD drives.
As for your question... I'm afraid fbackup does not support SDLTs.
Hardware-wise, you're good... Your SDLT can sustain an 11Mb/s native transfer rate, your A2969 can go up to 15Mb/s.
But I doubt whether native backup utilities like tar, especially fbackup, can work well with your beauty.
HTH,
Vince
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-21-2002 03:25 AM
11-21-2002 03:25 AM
Re: SuperDLT on a K-class server?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-21-2002 03:31 AM
11-21-2002 03:31 AM
Re: SuperDLT on a K-class server?
Sorry but you are wrong in this.
I'll not say anything about LVD or HVD but I'm absolutely sure that fbackup can work with SDLT.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-21-2002 03:39 AM
11-21-2002 03:39 AM
Re: SuperDLT on a K-class server?
It may work, but its not supported.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-21-2002 07:10 AM
11-21-2002 07:10 AM
Re: SuperDLT on a K-class server?
fbackup does not contain any "hard" dependencies on specific tape devices. So it doesn't check for inquiry strings, vendor IDs or things like that. Instead it asks the tape driver for specific features using ioctl's (especially MTIOCGET).
So, in general, it's an kernel (tape driver) issue, if fbackup rejects a tape device type.
In the case of SuperDLT1 the stape driver was enhanced to regcognize the device (however, this does not mean full support).
If fbackup works... then this meas that the drive was recognized.
In your case the frecover fails... and this is indeed a known and still not resolved problem. The SuperDLT1 unfortunately rejects any reads <4bytes (you may verify this using dd bs=1) and frecover unfortunately uses such reads during its header validation. Difficult to say who's fault this is.
So this is today's status:
1) frecover needs the ability to read with IOs <4bytes, and
2) SuperDLT1 does not support that.
Possible approaches:
1) The drive's firmware is changed, or
2) fbackup is changed.
The other possibility is to use frecover's remote mode also locally (localhost:/dev/rmt/..., see man page).
Best regards...
Dietmar.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-02-2002 04:03 PM
12-02-2002 04:03 PM
Re: SuperDLT on a K-class server?
How sure are you about SDLT's not being able to write <4bytes?
I have never heard of such a thing for any tape drive.
Does LTO/Ultirum have this problem also? That would be bad.
I am very curious to know