- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: suspected memory problem
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2004 09:04 PM
06-13-2004 09:04 PM
There is 2GB of memory in the server.
After a reboot on Friday, the memory was sitting at 40% used.
Today, it is now sitting at 98% used - and the system is running incredibly slow because of this.
I wanted to contact you because I suspect we have a problem with memory not being released.
Below is an example of our "top memory users" - the top sessions listed are not running anything - the users are sitting logged in not doing anything, but they are still claiming the most memory.
Is there anything we can check?
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2004 09:15 PM
06-13-2004 09:15 PM
Re: suspected memory problem
These are the reason everybody recommend for cold install rather than upgrade.
use glnce plus which give a hint about the memory usage by each process. Let's know the result
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2004 09:17 PM
06-13-2004 09:17 PM
Re: suspected memory problem
soory - it was a cold install of 11.00 we carried out (figure of speach(.
Glance results :
B3692A GlancePlus C.03.71.00 10:16:51 shse001 9000/898 Current Avg High
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Util S SA ARU U | 35% 35% 35%
Disk Util F F |100% 100% 100%
Mem Util S SU UB B | 99% 99% 99%
Swap Util U UR R | 46% 46% 46%
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MEMORY REPORT Users= 92
Event Current Cumulative Current Rate Cum Rate High Rate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page Faults 217 217 144.6 144.6 144.6
Page In 21 21 14.0 14.0 14.0
Page Out 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0
KB Paged In 268kb 268kb 178.6 178.6 178.6
KB Paged Out 0kb 0kb 0.0 0.0 0.0
Reactivations 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Deactivations 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0
KB Deactivated 0kb 0kb 0.0 0.0 0.0
VM Reads 17 17 11.3 11.3 11.3
VM Writes 0 0 11.3 0.0 0.0
Total VM : 262.4mb Sys Mem : 94.4mb User Mem: 899.7mb Phys Mem: 2.00gb
Active VM: 131.7mb Buf Cache: 1024mb Free Mem: 29.9mb Page 1 of 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-14-2004 01:29 AM
06-14-2004 01:29 AM
Re: suspected memory problem
Since Page Outs = 0, it would appear that memory is not the source of slow response in your system. Lowering the dbc_max value will show unused memory but I don't think you'll see any difference in performance. To see all the top users of memory, use this command:
UNIX95= ps -o vsz,ruser,pid,args | sort -rn | head -20
That will show the top 20 memory hogs. Increase -20 if you need to see more. The users may not be dpoing anything, but an idle program waiting on something from a user will not release memory. As with all performance issues, the programs that are running slow must be identified first. Is it login delays? Or compile times are very slow? Or execution of the same program with the same data is now 10x slower?
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-14-2004 03:17 AM
06-14-2004 03:17 AM
Re: suspected memory problem
Thanks for replying.
dbc_max_pct is currently at 50.
I'll make arrangements to decrease this on our test server first of all.
We currently have QualPack and HWE from Sept03 installed.
The system itself does not appear slower to me, but quite a few users are complaining that while accessing an informix application, they are experiencing delays.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-14-2004 04:51 AM
06-14-2004 04:51 AM
Re: suspected memory problem
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-15-2004 02:55 AM
06-15-2004 02:55 AM
Re: suspected memory problem
We reduced db_max_pct from 50 to 20 - memory has been at 40% since we rebooted.
Thought everything was going well until users received the following error -
Pid 7438 received a SIGSEGV for stack growth failure.
Possible causes: insufficient memory or swap space,
or stack size exceeded maxssiz.
Memory fault
Suspect it may have somthing to do with :
maxdsiz 67108864
maxssiz 8388608
maxtsiz 67108864
Has anyone any idea about this?
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-15-2004 03:03 AM
06-15-2004 03:03 AM
Solutionmaxssiz 8388608
maxtsiz 67108864
These are almost certainly too small. Reasonable values for maxdsiz might be about 512MB, 32-64MB for maxssiz, and 256MB for maxtsiz. You may also be facing limits with shmmax. Increasing these values consume no additional resources but they do allow a single process to consume resources up to these limits.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-15-2004 03:33 AM
06-15-2004 03:33 AM
Re: suspected memory problem
shmmax is currently 400MB -
I'll have a go at increasing these 4 parameters.
Bye