HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Syscall already definied: lwp_mutex_unlock_2
Operating System - HP-UX
1834788
Members
2824
Online
110070
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-04-2002 05:20 AM
11-04-2002 05:20 AM
Hello,
After I installed some patch, the system can't boot. The next message show:
sysent_assign_function: syscall already definied
system call # 53
name is "lwp_mutex_unlock_2"
1 argument(s)
32-bit call function at 0x32da30
32-bit dynamic function at 0x32da30
64-bit call function at 0x2bf180
64-bit dynamic function at 0x0
when I tried to remove the bundle installed, the system shows a dependecy message dialiog, but is empty, and can't continue the uninstall.
Best regards.
Marco
After I installed some patch, the system can't boot. The next message show:
sysent_assign_function: syscall already definied
system call # 53
name is "lwp_mutex_unlock_2"
1 argument(s)
32-bit call function at 0x32da30
32-bit dynamic function at 0x32da30
64-bit call function at 0x2bf180
64-bit dynamic function at 0x0
when I tried to remove the bundle installed, the system shows a dependecy message dialiog, but is empty, and can't continue the uninstall.
Best regards.
Marco
marco
Solved! Go to Solution.
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-04-2002 07:16 AM
11-04-2002 07:16 AM
Solution
The old syscall number 53 is being reused after installing some HP-UX kernel patches.
The 53 was used at least by CA's software "eTrust Access Control". They are now using number 254 instead which is officially reserverd for them.
Maybe this helps: http://support.ca.com/Download/patches/etrust/access_control/QO22955.html.
Regards...
Dietmar.
The 53 was used at least by CA's software "eTrust Access Control". They are now using number 254 instead which is officially reserverd for them.
Maybe this helps: http://support.ca.com/Download/patches/etrust/access_control/QO22955.html.
Regards...
Dietmar.
"Logic is the beginning of wisdom; not the end." -- Spock (Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-04-2007 01:43 PM
04-04-2007 01:43 PM
Re: Syscall already definied: lwp_mutex_unlock_2
Dietmar said:
> The 53 was used at least by CA's
> software "eTrust Access Control". They are
> now using number 254 instead which is
> officially reserverd for them.
So, who do I talk to to reserve a system
call number? I need one, and am willing
to implement it in a manner where other
users/vendors can share access to it
(i.e., so that this isn't the start of
hundreds of users asking for one :)
BTW, HP-UX 10.20 has 254 as SYS_ULSDEST,
and HP-UX 11.11 doesn't mention 254,
and HP-UX 11.23 doesn't mention 254.
thanks,
Stan
sieler@allegro.com
> The 53 was used at least by CA's
> software "eTrust Access Control". They are
> now using number 254 instead which is
> officially reserverd for them.
So, who do I talk to to reserve a system
call number? I need one, and am willing
to implement it in a manner where other
users/vendors can share access to it
(i.e., so that this isn't the start of
hundreds of users asking for one :)
BTW, HP-UX 10.20 has 254 as SYS_ULSDEST,
and HP-UX 11.11 doesn't mention 254,
and HP-UX 11.23 doesn't mention 254.
thanks,
Stan
sieler@allegro.com
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP