- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- system load average via snmp?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-04-2002 11:05 AM
04-04-2002 11:05 AM
This is standard fare under net-snmp (ucd-snmp) under ...private.enterprises, but HPUX's snmp agents' 4000-lines+ don't seem to contain the elusive load average numbers (1,5,15-minute).
Can I get load from the stock setup?
If not, what have others done? I'm not interested in workarounds, sar, etc., I'm trying to scale the tool we already have in place to gather this information.
Thanks for any help!
--Rob Lojek
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-04-2002 11:39 AM
04-04-2002 11:39 AM
SolutionYou can use snmpwalk/get to get the system load.
There are some good metrics under the tree
.iso.org.dod.internet.private.enterprises.hp.nm.system.general.computerSystem
If you are looking at the load, the following are the oids.
load average for 1 min * 100
.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.3.1.1.3
For 5 min
.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.3.1.1.4
For 15 min
.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.3.1.1.4
It will help you a lot if you have any snmpbrowsers or you can use snmpwalk and get all the possible values.
-Sri
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-04-2002 11:39 AM
04-04-2002 11:39 AM
Re: system load average via snmp?
You can use snmpwalk/get to get the system load.
There are some good metrics under the tree
.iso.org.dod.internet.private.enterprises.hp.nm.system.general.computerSystem
If you are looking at the load, the following are the oids.
load average for 1 min * 100
.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.3.1.1.3
For 5 min
.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.3.1.1.4
For 15 min
.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.3.1.1.5
It will help you a lot if you have any snmpbrowsers or you can use snmpwalk and get all the possible values.
-Sri
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-04-2002 11:43 AM
04-04-2002 11:43 AM
Re: system load average via snmp?
live free or die
harry
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-04-2002 12:09 PM
04-04-2002 12:09 PM
Re: system load average via snmp?
thanks for the note! I haven't tried your suggestion yet, since I just got finished building/installing net-snmp (4.2.4.pre3) (using:
binutils 2.9.1 binutils
gcc 2.95.2 gcc
packages), which compiled/installed without fanfare. It seems to be running stable, and it gives me the familiar
.1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.10.1.3.[1-3] OIDs that I've grown to love on our linux boxes. (no more HPUX one-offs).
I'm going to try your suggestion, but looks like net-snmp might be a good alternative, too.
thanks!
--Rob Lojek