- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- tape-to-tape copy, different machines
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-23-2007 04:40 AM
02-23-2007 04:40 AM
dd doesn't recognize "of=otherMachine:/dev/rmt/0m".
rcp doesn't seem to like "thisMachine:/dev/rmt/0m" as an arg.
cpio seems to want to look at headers.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-23-2007 04:58 AM
02-23-2007 04:58 AM
SolutionAbout your least evil and most reliable approach would be to restore the data using frecover and then fbackup to the newer tape drive. Of course, if your backups used /absolute paths then that is fraught with peril as well altough a chroot'ed restore would prevent you from cvlobbering an otherwise perfectly good system.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-23-2007 06:04 AM
02-23-2007 06:04 AM
Re: tape-to-tape copy, different machines
dd if=/dev/rmt/0m | remsh otherMachine 'dd of=/dev/rmt/0m'
I think you can do that with frestore | fbackup as well...
Rgds...Geoff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-23-2007 07:01 AM
02-23-2007 07:01 AM
Re: tape-to-tape copy, different machines
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-23-2007 10:00 AM
02-23-2007 10:00 AM
Re: tape-to-tape copy, different machines
I just remembered a program I wrote last year to copy 9-track tapes to disk. Disk files don't know about record lengths, but tapes insist on them. I might be able to use that method (and I probably wouldn't have thought of it till I read your responses. (After all, 9-tracks are round, and my program is a round-tape copier. (I copy the tape data to disk, along with a file of record lengths. On the output side, I write to the tape using those record lengths.)
I think the variable reord-length thing might make even the remsh suggestion unworkable.
I'll add to this thread again later as I exhaust more options....
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-23-2007 11:10 AM
02-23-2007 11:10 AM
Re: tape-to-tape copy, different machines
http://www1.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docLocale=en_US&docId=200000064722384
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-23-2007 03:28 PM
02-23-2007 03:28 PM
Re: tape-to-tape copy, different machines
Yes, it seems that's all you need to do, and if square tapes still have EOF marks, you need to remember them too.
>I copy the tape data to disk, along with a file of record lengths.
Any reason you didn't just intersperse the record lengths in the file, like typical variable length record formats?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-24-2007 03:17 AM
02-24-2007 03:17 AM
Re: tape-to-tape copy, different machines
i.e create a directory on your new 11i server and NFS export it back to the old 10.01 box. On the old box mount the NFS dir, cd to it and frecover with a -X to dump the contents local to the current directory.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-24-2007 03:29 AM
02-24-2007 03:29 AM
Re: tape-to-tape copy, different machines
... -f oldbox:/dev/rmt/0m ... to dump the tape to a local dir, then re-backup, like what was said above.
Its a good idea to migrate your old tape data to new media, because I have noticed that old DDS tapes get sticky and unreliable if not periodically aired with a wind-through, but if you wind them too often they get worn out anyway so you can't win with an old tape.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-24-2007 05:43 AM
02-24-2007 05:43 AM
Re: tape-to-tape copy, different machines
AFAIK, a DAT72 Drive can at least READ a DDS2 (=120m) tapes: did you really verify, that e.g. the index of your fbackup DAT cannot be read from your new DAT drive?
NTHL, it is a good idea to 'refresh' the old backup tapes, like Steve suggested!
If the tapes are readable, you can da a local restore + backup to new tapes.
But why do you use no DDS4 or DAT72 DATs? You had a higher compatibility for future devices, compared to DDS3: A - really old - 60m-DDS cannot be written in a DDS4 drive, today.
mfG Peter