HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- TCP/IP load balancing in MC/SG
Operating System - HP-UX
1829107
Members
2750
Online
109986
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-16-2000 07:52 AM
11-16-2000 07:52 AM
TCP/IP load balancing in MC/SG
Hi All,
I have a MC/Service Guard cluster consisting of two systems.
Two packages are configured with two floating IP address. When the packages are running on the same system, each floating IP would be assigned to different network card, thus why I could achive load balancing. ( clients always use floating IP to connect to this host ).
Now the questions is that when this server makes an outbond TCP/IP connection how can I ensure that it goes through a particular IP/Network card ( I want to achive load balancing/segregation for outbond tcp/ip communication too ) ?
Please note that all the network interface cards are on the same subnet ( HP-UX 11.0, Logical IP is used )
Note: Maximum out bond connections are made bewteen servers within the same subnet.
Any suggestions ?
I have a MC/Service Guard cluster consisting of two systems.
Two packages are configured with two floating IP address. When the packages are running on the same system, each floating IP would be assigned to different network card, thus why I could achive load balancing. ( clients always use floating IP to connect to this host ).
Now the questions is that when this server makes an outbond TCP/IP connection how can I ensure that it goes through a particular IP/Network card ( I want to achive load balancing/segregation for outbond tcp/ip communication too ) ?
Please note that all the network interface cards are on the same subnet ( HP-UX 11.0, Logical IP is used )
Note: Maximum out bond connections are made bewteen servers within the same subnet.
Any suggestions ?
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-16-2000 09:24 AM
11-16-2000 09:24 AM
Re: TCP/IP load balancing in MC/SG
Hi
IMHO
Unless the LAN cards are very heavily loaded what you wish to achieve will not make any real changes to your server.
Also the LAN cards are on the same subnet so as to which card the traffic leaves by will not make any real difference. (Lengths of cable and speed of electricity come into play).
Load balancing is more to do with disks (stripe / mirror /SCSI cards etc).
Paula
IMHO
Unless the LAN cards are very heavily loaded what you wish to achieve will not make any real changes to your server.
Also the LAN cards are on the same subnet so as to which card the traffic leaves by will not make any real difference. (Lengths of cable and speed of electricity come into play).
Load balancing is more to do with disks (stripe / mirror /SCSI cards etc).
Paula
If you can spell SysAdmin then you is one - anon
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-16-2000 10:25 AM
11-16-2000 10:25 AM
Re: TCP/IP load balancing in MC/SG
Hi,
The route that the outbound traffic uses is determined from the routing table.
Multiple interfaces in the same subnet give you problems because you don't have the control to specify which interface you want to use for a given route. I believe the system will use the most recent interface configured.
Have you considered auto-port aggregation which allows you to aggregate several LAN cards into one virtual interface? It does require a compatible switch however.
Regards,
John
The route that the outbound traffic uses is determined from the routing table.
Multiple interfaces in the same subnet give you problems because you don't have the control to specify which interface you want to use for a given route. I believe the system will use the most recent interface configured.
Have you considered auto-port aggregation which allows you to aggregate several LAN cards into one virtual interface? It does require a compatible switch however.
Regards,
John
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-16-2000 10:50 AM
11-16-2000 10:50 AM
Re: TCP/IP load balancing in MC/SG
Hi John,
Thanks for your reply.
The idea is to bind different application network traffic to different set of network interface card but the unfortunate thing is that they are on same subnet , ?route? could have been of some use otherwise.
I am using ?IP Logical Interface? to plug both the network interface in the same subnet.
John, could u please tell me how can I get ?auto port aggregation? in HP-UX 11.0 for outbound traffic ?
Is there any way to specify that traffic to a X.X.X.X address in my own subnet to be routed via X Network interface card on my system ? ( not with route command )
Regards,
Pramod
Thanks for your reply.
The idea is to bind different application network traffic to different set of network interface card but the unfortunate thing is that they are on same subnet , ?route? could have been of some use otherwise.
I am using ?IP Logical Interface? to plug both the network interface in the same subnet.
John, could u please tell me how can I get ?auto port aggregation? in HP-UX 11.0 for outbound traffic ?
Is there any way to specify that traffic to a X.X.X.X address in my own subnet to be routed via X Network interface card on my system ? ( not with route command )
Regards,
Pramod
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP