GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Telnet sessions
Operating System - HP-UX
1847899
Members
4032
Online
104021
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-18-2001 05:36 AM
07-18-2001 05:36 AM
Telnet sessions
Hi,
I noticed that telnet session from clients on my LAN/WAN are taking about 15 sec to establish connection with the HP9000 server. Pinging any machine including the HP9000 server gives a response time of less the 10ms. We have recently segmented the LAN servers from the workstations and of course routers are used to connect from remote locations. Is there anything I can do to RPC on the HP server to speed up to connection time?
I noticed that telnet session from clients on my LAN/WAN are taking about 15 sec to establish connection with the HP9000 server. Pinging any machine including the HP9000 server gives a response time of less the 10ms. We have recently segmented the LAN servers from the workstations and of course routers are used to connect from remote locations. Is there anything I can do to RPC on the HP server to speed up to connection time?
Sys Admin
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-18-2001 05:56 AM
07-18-2001 05:56 AM
Re: Telnet sessions
Hi:
This sounds like a DNS reverse-name lookup timing issue. Are you using DNS? Try pinging by hostname and by IPaddress. If this is a reverse lookup problem, the ping by hostname should be slower than by IPaddress. IF this is the case, define your clients to DNS or put them in your /etc/hosts file and specify the following in /etc/nsswitch.conf:
hosts: files [NOTFOUND=continue] dns
...JRF...
This sounds like a DNS reverse-name lookup timing issue. Are you using DNS? Try pinging by hostname and by IPaddress. If this is a reverse lookup problem, the ping by hostname should be slower than by IPaddress. IF this is the case, define your clients to DNS or put them in your /etc/hosts file and specify the following in /etc/nsswitch.conf:
hosts: files [NOTFOUND=continue] dns
...JRF...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-18-2001 05:04 PM
07-18-2001 05:04 PM
Re: Telnet sessions
James' suggestion is fine for LAN's where the desktops have static IP's. However, I've been struggling with a situation where a client uses DHCP to allocate IP's to desktops. Static reverse DNS entries are not appropriate there.
The only solution I can think of is to implement an internal DNS server using Windows2000 which not only supports dynamic DNS based on DHCP, but also supports dynamic reverse DNS. WinNT 4.0 doesn't support dynamic reverse DNS.
The Unix systems would then use the W2K server as the primary resolver and have no trouble looking up the name of a connecting workstation.
Looks good on the whiteboard so far :)
The only solution I can think of is to implement an internal DNS server using Windows2000 which not only supports dynamic DNS based on DHCP, but also supports dynamic reverse DNS. WinNT 4.0 doesn't support dynamic reverse DNS.
The Unix systems would then use the W2K server as the primary resolver and have no trouble looking up the name of a connecting workstation.
Looks good on the whiteboard so far :)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-19-2001 12:07 PM
07-19-2001 12:07 PM
Re: Telnet sessions
I ran into the same problem. I found one quick solution is to hack your /etc/hosts file. I created a quick script which loop 255 times for the subnet which my client's dhcp ips were on and included false host names. I am not sure if they is appropiate in your environment but it worked real good when I used it. Here is an example of what I am talking about.
clients dhcp ips are 128.10.10.1 through 5
add the following lines to /etc/host
128.10.10.1 dhcp1
128.10.10.2 dhcp2
128.10.10.3 dhcp3
128.10.10.4 dhcp4
128.10.10.5 dhcp5
Since the system could not look up these addresses before, it can't hurt to give it some made up host names. Of course this might be more tricky if you have alot of DHCP ips.
clients dhcp ips are 128.10.10.1 through 5
add the following lines to /etc/host
128.10.10.1 dhcp1
128.10.10.2 dhcp2
128.10.10.3 dhcp3
128.10.10.4 dhcp4
128.10.10.5 dhcp5
Since the system could not look up these addresses before, it can't hurt to give it some made up host names. Of course this might be more tricky if you have alot of DHCP ips.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2026 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP