- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Typical problem on HP servers!!!
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-19-2001 03:31 AM
09-19-2001 03:31 AM
Typical problem on HP servers!!!
Recently, I have observed a typical problem with our HP-UX servers , we have Xonnet software installed on Windows NT 4.0 clients and HP servers are restricting some of the IP addresses to get connected to it but the same clients get connected without any problem to SUN servers. We have checked and tried all the options but so far there is no break through and could not able to isolate the problem.
Problem description :-
IP address 10.184.8.2 is able to connect using Xonnet but 10.184.8.4 fails, so in the same subnet few IP's work and few fails, this is only one instance, similarly we have some other subnets with similar problems. But all the clients are able to get connected via Telnet. And there is no restriction whatsoever on the network equipments as we have tested by connecting to the HP server directly by laptop using cross cable but the response is same so this eliminates any network equipment related problem also.
Hardware/ OS details of HP servers :
Hardware Model : 9000/820/D280 and 9000/800/L3000-5x
OS version : HP-UX B. 11.00 U
Please do let me know the solution for resolving the above problem or any patch requirement on HP servers.
Thanks & Regards.
Subhash
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-19-2001 03:43 AM
09-19-2001 03:43 AM
Re: Typical problem on HP servers!!!
Hope this helps
Ron
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-19-2001 04:04 AM
09-19-2001 04:04 AM
Re: Typical problem on HP servers!!!
-Santosh
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-20-2001 06:01 AM
09-20-2001 06:01 AM
Re: Typical problem on HP servers!!!
Thanks for your suggestions.
Good news is my problem got resolved. We found some important entry missing in our Secondary DNS server, after making that entry, everything is fine.
Thanks once again for the help extended by you.
Regards,
Subhash Pippala
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-21-2001 06:16 AM
09-21-2001 06:16 AM
Re: Typical problem on HP servers!!!
i had similar a problem. The reason was that the name resolution doesn't work correct for the hosts, because the XServer try to get the hostname by the IP-Address. In my case the entry of the client in DNS reverse lookup zone was not correct.
Marcus