Upgrade Issues

[Terry Gibbar]

Following an upgrade to 11.0, we are now receiving the following errors from an application:

Sep 7 14:14:29 omhq1824 ADIMS.1.Z10[5973]: (22003) No Subject: Connection to pe
er 167.132.68.171(20200) failed with error (239) Connection refused
Sep 7 14:14:29 omhq1824 ADIMS.1.Z10[5973]: (22003) No Subject: Connection to pe
er 167.132.68.171(20201) failed with error (239) Connection refused
Sep 7 14:14:29 omhq1824 ADIMS.1.Z10[5973]: (22003) No Subject: Connection to pe
er 167.132.68.171(20202) failed with error (239) Connection refused
Sep 7 14:14:29 omhq1824 ADIMS.1.Z10[5973]: (22003) No Subject: Connection to pe
er 167.132.68.171(20300) failed with error (239) Connection refused
Sep 7 14:14:49 omhq1824 ADIMS.1.Z10[5973]: (22003) No Subject: Connection to pe
er 167.132.68.171(20100) failed with error (239) Connection refused

The compile of the application code was apparently successful (Softbench 6.50).

I know this isn't much to go on, but any input would be deeply appreciated.

- Terry

[Terry Gibbar]

Is there anything different about how sockets are handled on HP-UX 11.0 and HP-UX 10.20?

[Stefan Farrelly]

Youre right, its not a lot to go on. Usually Connection refused errors are caused by network problems, be it tha actual network on setup on either host.

Things to possibly check;
make sure you can ping the .171 address and get a nice consistent ping time back
lanscan - see if you are losing packets
can you telnet/ftp to the .171 address ?
check syslog for any network related messages
are your patches up-to-date ?
If you really need to, use nettune -l (see man page on nettune)
or else you get into the realms of bad cables, hub/router config etc.

[Rick Garland]

Have you chack to ensure that the Softbench is using the same sockets in 11.00 as it was in 10.20?

[Terry Gibbar]

Rick,

How would one go about checking if softbench is using the same sockets on 11.0 as 10.20?

Thanks,
Terry