HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- values of these parameters
Operating System - HP-UX
1827593
Members
2672
Online
109965
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-20-2002 01:22 AM
09-20-2002 01:22 AM
Re: values of these parameters
I have these disks mixed
18GB ST318404LC 33 MB/s
18GB ST118202LC 17 MB/s
>>how often are they done? What is the purpose of them? How critical is performance of the resulting binaries? Would reducing the optimization level of the compilations be an option?
The compilations are infact done on a daily basis and shipped to the client.
Yes we are supporting the Banking software.
When there is a spec change or something all the sl which have got changed are again complied and shipped to the client.
As these sizes of the compilation files are huge they take long hours to complete.
I know there is sure a memory crunch on some of my L-class servers.
The steps we have taken is that
1.Application was tuned for unwanted code.
2.Incremental builds were carried on.
3.The sl were grouped and the 4 simultaneous processes were run.
Actually there is very big time difference avoided due to this split and simultaneous fire of jobs on the unix system.
5.Also these were equally distributed so that all the processes complete at the same time.
6.There are 4 to 5 process compilations are carried over.
Each process takes 20 hrs to complete and the entire build completes in that time.
Using glance I could see a large memory usage.
Infact each process using around 500MB on the machine.
There is no nfs involved in this process.
Thanks
18GB ST318404LC 33 MB/s
18GB ST118202LC 17 MB/s
>>how often are they done? What is the purpose of them? How critical is performance of the resulting binaries? Would reducing the optimization level of the compilations be an option?
The compilations are infact done on a daily basis and shipped to the client.
Yes we are supporting the Banking software.
When there is a spec change or something all the sl which have got changed are again complied and shipped to the client.
As these sizes of the compilation files are huge they take long hours to complete.
I know there is sure a memory crunch on some of my L-class servers.
The steps we have taken is that
1.Application was tuned for unwanted code.
2.Incremental builds were carried on.
3.The sl were grouped and the 4 simultaneous processes were run.
Actually there is very big time difference avoided due to this split and simultaneous fire of jobs on the unix system.
5.Also these were equally distributed so that all the processes complete at the same time.
6.There are 4 to 5 process compilations are carried over.
Each process takes 20 hrs to complete and the entire build completes in that time.
Using glance I could see a large memory usage.
Infact each process using around 500MB on the machine.
There is no nfs involved in this process.
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-20-2002 03:45 AM
09-20-2002 03:45 AM
Re: values of these parameters
This is from hp tuning guide
//*
ninode
Ninode sizes the in-core inode table, also called the inode cache. For performance, the most recently accessed inodes are kept in memory. Each open file has an inode in the table. An entry is made in the table for each "login directory", each "current directory", each mount point directory, etc. It is recommended that ninode be set to 15,000.
NOTE: On a multi-processor system running HP-UX 10-20, ninode should NOT exceed 4000. This is due to a spinlock contention problem that is fixed in 11.0.
*//
http://docs.hp.com/hpux/onlinedocs/os/11.0/tuningwp.html
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-20-2002 03:52 AM
09-20-2002 03:52 AM
Re: values of these parameters
I feel that hp tuning guide has taken a very high end machine with huge resources that the parameters are so high.
Arent they?
Arent they?
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP