- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Virtual IP's from multiple subnets on a single...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-13-2005 12:45 PM
07-13-2005 12:45 PM
Can you think of a reason why you would ever be able to make use of multiple subnetted virtual IP's attached to a single interface? If not, then should the tools stop you?
If you did alias a virtual IP from a different subnet to an interface that already contained multiple active/functioning virtual IP's from a single subnet what would happen?
Would all packets that go out the interface be hopelessly lost? i.e. no outgoing traffic? what would outgoing connections use for the source IP? the lowest lanX:0 IP or would they take on the higher lanX:N (Where N>0) IP for the source?
Very curious and sorry for asking dumb questions, I am just very curious.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-14-2005 01:11 AM
07-14-2005 01:11 AM
Re: Virtual IP's from multiple subnets on a single Interface... what happens?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-14-2005 07:17 AM
07-14-2005 07:17 AM
SolutionBasically the system looks kind of like a router. You have multiple IP addresses sharing the same mac address.
A router sends and receives packets for multiple networks through the same interface. It simply looks at the IP header of the packet and routes it to the correct stack.
Assume we had a HPUX configured as:
lan0 192.168.1.50
lan0:1 172.16.10.60
any packets sent to a 172.16.10.0 address would leave the I/F with the I/F's mac and a source IP of 172.16.10.60. Packets to a 192.168.1.0 address would use 192.168.1.50 as its source address.
If the system needed to go to a router with an address of 192.168.1.200, it would use the 192.168.1.50 address.
The system would respond to ARPs for either IP with the same mac address. All incoming packets would have the destination IP checked and the packet would be routed to the correct internal IP stack
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-14-2005 08:01 AM
07-14-2005 08:01 AM
Re: Virtual IP's from multiple subnets on a single Interface... what happens?
UNIX because I majored in cryptology...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-15-2005 03:23 AM
07-15-2005 03:23 AM
Re: Virtual IP's from multiple subnets on a single Interface... what happens?
There is no reason the commands in HP-UX (what I presume you mean by "the tools") should preclude it.