- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Volume Groups?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-15-2004 01:49 AM
03-15-2004 01:49 AM
I have a tape array 5300 with 12 36gb drives on it for Oracle databases which I will load later. I have created three LUN's with these drives. 155, 50, 60gb. Active spare set to automatic, and set to AutoRaid.
155 for databases and the oracle load itself.
50 archive logs
60 backups
When going into SAM it is asking if I want to create a new volume group or use an existing one.
Should I create a new volume group for each LUN, or one group for all, or use the same volume group vg00? What is the plus and minus of either?
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-15-2004 01:55 AM
03-15-2004 01:55 AM
Re: Volume Groups?
Reason: Disaster REcovery.
You can use make_tape_recovery to get vg00 images, which a lot of us normally limit to OS/boot filesystems. You can then, if a patch messes up your system recover back to from tape without overwriting your data.
This seems like a strategy post, so I'll giv you mine.
I have vg00 strictly boot and OS. vg01 is binaries, software and stuff. vg02 is exclusively for oracle data. It makes things neat and easy to remember.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-15-2004 02:09 AM
03-15-2004 02:09 AM
Re: Volume Groups?
Beyond that is it pretty much up to you. Rather than thinking in terms of LUN's and VG's, think in terms of LVOL's. Also note that a VG can be comprised of multiple LUN's and often this is a good idea since it gives you a method to spread IO across multiple SCSI buses. I would tend to divide Oracle into at least 3 LVOL/filesystems within the same VG. One for binaries, one for data/indices, and one for archive/redo logs. That lets you play with various mount options. One other approach that I would use if using raw devices for databases is to add a level of indirection. For example, suppose that you are using /dev/vg01/rlvol2 as a datafile. Rather than using the raw devive directly, use /oradata/user01.raw and then symbolically link /oradata/user01.raw to /dev/vg01/rlvol2. That way, future changes are trivially easy. You could even go back to fully cooked I/O with no Oracle changes.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-15-2004 02:13 AM
03-15-2004 02:13 AM
Re: Volume Groups?
As far as oracle goes. How to break it up depends. Typically you want to spread the I/O out on as many channels as possible.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-15-2004 02:21 AM
03-15-2004 02:21 AM
Re: Volume Groups?
As UNIX files and directories are arranged in a systematic manner, like a tree structure it is a recommended practice to organize logical volume/volume groups in similar fashion for beter management and system recovery (if needed).
sks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-15-2004 03:54 AM
03-15-2004 03:54 AM
SolutionVgcreate volume groups as per the following standard
Preamble: VG00 - VG09 are internal disks, VG10 and higher are reserved for EMC/Disk Arrays.
VG00
The root volume group VG00 should be mirrored and only contain OS files.
Primary swap should be 1 x memory
/ - 140MB (HP Default)
/usr - 1 GB
/var - 1GB
/tmp - 512MB
/stand - 128MB
/var/adm/crash - 1 x memory + 512MB
/opt - 1GB
/home - 512MB with quotas (32MB soft, 64MB hard)
Note: /var/tmp should be a symbolic link to /tmp. /tmp should be 1777 (sticky bit).
VG01
/app - 512MB
/usr/local - 512MB
/app/admin - 512MB
VG02
File system swap
VG03
Applications
VG04-VG09
Reserved
VG10 - VG19
Log volumes (redo, archive, etc)
VG20 - VG256
Data volumes
Miscellaneous
Don't use strict/contiguous when creating logical volumes.
Create file systems with "large file" support (fsadm).
Mount file systems with "delaylog".
Rgds...Geoff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-15-2004 04:49 PM
03-15-2004 04:49 PM
Re: Volume Groups?
I will strictly recommend not to use the existing one as
1)Easier to Diagnose if any problem.
2)No Quorum Problems in case of multiple Disk Failures.
3)Easier to see the i/o processes and bottlenecks.
There doesn't seems any Minus.
Regards,