- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- vPar and HPVM
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-28-2010 04:14 PM
01-28-2010 04:14 PM
vPar and HPVM
"HPVM is not supported on Virtual partitions.."
What is the technical reason behind this.?
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-28-2010 04:54 PM
01-28-2010 04:54 PM
Re: vPar and HPVM
I remember being left unsatisfied by such a quick explanation and asked "Final answer?" but couldn't get any more details except a strong feeling that the powers at be at HP were not interested in doing this.
I did hear a rumor there that vPars are going away (and no, I'm not going to tell who I heard it from). Which would be a shame, as I find them very useful when doing performance testing and this can't be measured accurately in virtual environments.
Olivier
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-28-2010 04:58 PM
01-28-2010 04:58 PM
Re: vPar and HPVM
Probably the vpdb's responsibility of mapping a complete inventory of the npar, and how each resource remains whole, at 100%, and can't be split into virtual disks, or percentages of a whole disk, or CPUS, etc.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-28-2010 06:39 PM
01-28-2010 06:39 PM
Re: vPar and HPVM
As far as I can think HPVM could be compatible on vPar, cause HPVM thing would start only after vPar comes up and it would not be having anything to do with nPar and vPar config.
Well it would be double virtual..... ;)
BR,
Kapil+
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-29-2010 01:07 AM
01-29-2010 01:07 AM
Re: vPar and HPVM
As for HPVM in a vPar - I doubt there are many technical issues, but its a bit of a corner case really isn't it? Kind of like running virtual box in a VMWare guest... Unless there was a hell of a lot of demand for it, I doubt the labs would want to do the qualification testing required for it.
Remember, its easy for us to say here "it should work" - but to support this in mission critical environments would require a significant investment in testing - as I'm sure you know, people to cost benefit analyses and I'm not sure this one would stack up.
My opinions only - not those of HP...
HTH
Duncan
I am an HPE Employee
