- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- vPar vs nPar
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-02-2003 07:34 PM
02-02-2003 07:34 PM
vPar vs nPar
Could anyone explain me briefly on virtual and npartitions??. What is the key difference b/w them and which performs better?? ( We are planning to buy one rp8470)
Thanks,
Karthik
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-02-2003 07:46 PM
02-02-2003 07:46 PM
Re: vPar vs nPar
Have you looked here:
http://www.docs.hp.com/cgi-bin/fsearch/framedisplay?top=/hpux/onlinedocs/B2355-90762/B2355-90762_top.html&con=/hpux/onlinedocs/B2355-90762/00/01/139-con.html&toc=/hpux/onlinedocs/B2355-90762/00/01/139-toc.html&searchterms=vPAR&queryid=20030202-202309
Cheers
Michael
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-02-2003 07:52 PM
02-02-2003 07:52 PM
Re: vPar vs nPar
After having a quick look of that link I can understand that vPar can be configured with in a nPar ..!!. But if possible could you please brief me on nPar??
Thanks
Karthik
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-02-2003 08:03 PM
02-02-2003 08:03 PM
Re: vPar vs nPar
The overview of the same document should help.
http://www.docs.hp.com/hpux/onlinedocs/B2355-90762/B2355-90762.html
Regards
Michael
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-03-2003 12:50 AM
02-03-2003 12:50 AM
Re: vPar vs nPar
For a superdome you can run nPars and vPars on the same server, for an N-class (rp7xxx/8xxx) you can only run vPars.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-03-2003 02:58 AM
02-03-2003 02:58 AM
Re: vPar vs nPar
Thanks for that. But I guess rp8470 supports 2 npartitions and multiple vPars with nPartitions. Is that right??
Regards,
Karthik
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-03-2003 03:09 AM
02-03-2003 03:09 AM
Re: vPar vs nPar
Yes even rp8400/rp8470 also supports npartitions(but only 2 n partitions) we can create v partitions in each n partitions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-03-2003 03:32 AM
02-03-2003 03:32 AM
Re: vPar vs nPar
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-03-2003 05:19 AM
02-03-2003 05:19 AM
Re: vPar vs nPar
Most "production" servers require redundant connections to disk devices, and of course at least one network connection. This adds up to at least 3 cards, and if your "servers" require any other connectivity, say a TAPE Drive, then you require at least 4 cards per partition.
With an rp8400, you get 8 IO slots PER nPar. Which means that if you wish to build production servers, then you can have 4 to 6 partitons total - 6 providing you use the internal devices within each nPar.
As for your question: "Which performs better", well that will TOTALLY depend upon your usage of the machine. How many partitions did you plan on using? What kind of applications would be running in each? What kind of external storage do you have? How many angels can fit on the head of a pin? How many CPU's, memory, IO cards, .....
live free or die
harry