- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- vparmodify
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-01-2008 04:12 AM
04-01-2008 04:12 AM
On this npar there are two cell boards.
Class I H/W Path Driver S/W State H/W Type Description
cell 0 1 cell CLAIMED BUS_NEXUS
cell 1 2 cell CLAIMED BUS_NEXUS
I do an ioscan of vpar2 and select the ioscan -fn devices the vpar is not using.
ba 7 2/0/8 lba CLAIMED BUS_NEXUS Local PCI-X Bus Adapter (12ee)
fc 4 2/0/8/1/0 fcd CLAIMED INTERFACE HP AB379-60101 4Gb Dual Port PCI/PCI-X Fibre Channel Adapter (FC Port 1)
/dev/fcd4
fc 5 2/0/8/1/1 fcd CLAIMED INTERFACE HP AB379-60101 4Gb Dual Port PCI/PCI-X Fibre Channel Adapter (FC Port 2)
/dev/fcd5
Then I run these commands and nothing is removed.
#vparmodify -p vpar2 -d io:2/0/8 -d io:2/0/8/1/0 -d io:2/0/8/1/1
vparmodify: Error: "-d io:2/0/8": The device at the specified path is not an I/O device.
# vparmodify -p vpar2 -d io:2/0/8/1/0 -d io:2/0/8/1/1
vparmodify: Error: "-d io:2/0/8/1/0": The device at the specified path is not an I/O device.
# vparmodify -p vpar2 -d io:0/8
vparmodify: Error: "-d io:0/8": The device at the specified path is not an I/O device.
# vparmodify -p vpar2 -d io:2.0.8
vparmodify: Error: "-d io:2.0.8": The device at the specified path is not an I/O device
Any Ideas?
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-01-2008 04:46 AM
04-01-2008 04:46 AM
Re: vparmodify
# vparstatus -v -p vpar2
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-01-2008 04:53 AM
04-01-2008 04:53 AM
Re: vparmodify
[Virtual Partition Details]
Name: vpar2
State: Up
Attributes: Dynamic,Autoboot,Nosearch
Kernel Path: /stand/vmunix
Boot Opts:
[CPU Details]
Min/Max: 1/16
User assigned [Path]:
Boot processor [Path]: 1.120
Monitor assigned [Path]: 1.123
1.124
1.125
Non-cell-specific:
User assigned [Count]: 0
Monitor assigned [Count]: 4
Cell-specific [Count]: Cell ID/Count
[IO Details]
2.0.0.2.0.6.0
2.0.0.3.0.6.0
2.0
2.0.0.2.0.6.0.0.0.0.0 BOOT
2.0.0.3.0.6.0.0.0.0.0,ALTBOOT
[Memory Details]
ILM, user-assigned [Base /Range]:
(bytes) (MB)
ILM, monitor-assigned [Base /Range]: 0x1e0000000/16384
(bytes) (MB)
ILM Total (MB): 16384
ILM Granularity (MB): 128
CLM, user-assigned [CellID Base /Range]:
(bytes) (MB)
CLM, monitor-assigned [CellID Base /Range]:
(bytes) (MB)
CLM (CellID MB):
CLM Granularity (MB): 128
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-01-2008 04:58 AM
04-01-2008 04:58 AM
Re: vparmodify
[IO Details]
2.0.0.2.0.6.0
2.0.0.3.0.6.0
2.0
2.0.0.2.0.6.0.0.0.0.0 BOOT
2.0.0.3.0.6.0.0.0.0.0,ALTBOOT
this is not this good.
Resource 2.0 is assigned, so this means all below this system bus adapter.
If you want to remove 2.0.8, you need IMHO to remove "2.0" first and add all remaining needed LBAs.
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-01-2008 05:01 AM
04-01-2008 05:01 AM
Re: vparmodify
How would I go about the reconfiguration.
And what does IMHO stand for?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-01-2008 05:06 AM
04-01-2008 05:06 AM
Re: vparmodify
As long as the SBA 2.0 is assigned to this vpar, all LBAs are assigned.
I would record the configuration details and simply delete and re-create this vpar.
This does not harm the OS installation on the boot disk.
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-01-2008 05:12 AM
04-01-2008 05:12 AM
Re: vparmodify
Would it seem reasonable to do a make_net_recovery, shutdown the vpar, delete it and recreate, with out using make_net_recovery?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-01-2008 05:21 AM
04-01-2008 05:21 AM
SolutionThe current config does not look very well.
As mentioned earlier, assigning the whole SBA does not make so much sense.
These entries don't make any sense at all:
2.0.0.2.0.6.0
2.0.0.3.0.6.0
because they are already covered.
I would record the information from
# vparstatus -v -p vpar2
# vparstatus -v
# vparstatus
and
# ioscan -fn
think about what LBA's I would need in future, delete the vpar and re-create.
Finally think about what resources to assign to what vPar. IMHO it makes more sense to spread the assigned slots over the IO chassis, e.g. 1 FC card in IO bay 0, one card in IO bay 1 and so on ... but maybe the other IO chassis is allocated by vpar1 the same way.
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-01-2008 05:25 AM
04-01-2008 05:25 AM
Re: vparmodify
Thanks for all your advice, I will do this today and post the outcome