- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: VxVM x LVM
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-22-2002 09:57 AM
07-22-2002 09:57 AM
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-22-2002 10:09 AM
07-22-2002 10:09 AM
Re: VxVM x LVM
I believe that to "release" a VxVM disk from its control, that you are going to have to install (at least) the base VxVM product.
Regards!
...JRF...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-22-2002 10:24 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-22-2002 10:26 AM
07-22-2002 10:26 AM
Re: VxVM x LVM
I used the command "dd", and it solved the problem.
Thanks to everybody
MF
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-22-2002 10:30 AM
07-22-2002 10:30 AM
Re: VxVM x LVM
While I am not very familar with VxVM, the brute force 'dd' of an LVM disk would not only remove the LVM information but leave critical configuration files (notably '/etc/lvmtab') in an inconsistent state. In my opinion, you may have done yourself a dis-service.
Regards!
...JRF...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-22-2002 10:50 AM
07-22-2002 10:50 AM
Re: VxVM x LVM
I agree with you, but in this case, /etc/lvmtab hasn??t any pointer to these disks, and "dd" ended the VxVM pointer.
Thanks
MF
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-22-2002 10:59 AM
07-22-2002 10:59 AM
Re: VxVM x LVM
To be safe, I recommend using mediainit (man 1m mediainit for more info) later on.
Hai
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-22-2002 11:10 AM
07-22-2002 11:10 AM
Re: VxVM x LVM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-23-2002 04:49 AM
07-23-2002 04:49 AM
Re: VxVM x LVM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-23-2002 04:59 AM
07-23-2002 04:59 AM
Re: VxVM x LVM
Frank - are you still spreading rumours not to use mediainit ? I thought we'd been here before.
HP-UX 11i also comes with mediainit included as part of the OS-Core.SYS-ADMIN fileset, seeing as 11i is very new why on earth would HP include it if it wasnt recommended to use it ?
From the man page for mediainit on 11i it says;
"Most HP hard disks are formatted and exhaustively tested at the factory by use of a process more thorough but also more time-consuming than appropriate for mediainit. However, mediainit is still valuable for ensuring the integrity of the media after factory shipment, formatting with the correct interleave factor, and sparing any blocks which may have become defective since original factory testing was performed."
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-23-2002 05:32 AM
07-23-2002 05:32 AM
Re: VxVM x LVM
Also I would have thought that a 'pvcreate -f' would have done the trick.
Also remember to remove any /dev/vx/.. files for the disk.
Regards,
Trond
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-23-2002 05:35 AM
07-23-2002 05:35 AM
Re: VxVM x LVM
As to why 'not-recommended' stuff is still included in HP-UX:
mediainit is *hardly* ever needed, but there *are* some very *exceptional* uses, *not* for *hard* disks, which is why HP still supplies it. This very exceptional use is: partitioning DDS tapes ('never' used) and low-level formatting diskettes (nowadays most diskettes are LLFed during production). (Some people also use it to be able to use disks which have the wrong sector size. For what it is worth, I consider that also inappropriate use, for the same reason as given above.)
As to your quote from the manual page: Yes, I know what it says. However also note that it talks quite a lot about CS/80 and SS/80 which are protocols which are obsolete for some 15+ years, i.e. this is a very old manual page, which has not been adapted to current needs.
I think this problem can only be solved by user education, which is not easy, if not 'impossible' to do in a manual page. If it was easy, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
In case you want to contact me 'off-line': frank_slootweg@hp.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-23-2002 06:16 AM
07-23-2002 06:16 AM
Re: VxVM x LVM
If you can produce an HP official document stating not to use it then Im all ears.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-23-2002 06:36 AM
07-23-2002 06:36 AM
Re: VxVM x LVM
I explained what did and did not happen and why. There is nothing more I can add.
And no, as far I know, there is no "HP official document stating not to use it". If there was, we wouldn't be having this discussion. However, if you think that the absence of (official) negative advice means that it is recommended/not_dangerous/etc., then I can only say that I do not agree with that reasoning.
If you want to continue this, then please contact me by e-mail because this looks more like a fight than a discussion. (You have my e-mail address. I don't have yours.)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-23-2002 08:25 AM
07-23-2002 08:25 AM
Re: VxVM x LVM
Would you believe the advice if it came from Bill Hassell?
Read his response in this thread:
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0xdbbb3a7b3682d611abdb0090277a778c,00.html
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-23-2002 03:15 PM
07-23-2002 03:15 PM
Re: VxVM x LVM
It's really hard to get people to work on fixing/removing/documenting obsolete stuff, and even harder to get it funded. I'm still waiting for the labs to document SpeedyBoot even though the project was completed 2 years ago (see man setboot for 11i).
As for the original question, a simple pvcreate -f should wipe out the VxVM headers.
Bill Hassell, sysadmin