- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Weird Problem!!!
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-04-2002 01:55 PM
02-04-2002 01:55 PM
Weird Problem!!!
ANd recently i added a new node with autoport aggregation. These nodes are connected to XP512.
Now for the problem. WHen the auto port aggregation is down..there is no packet loss..but when its aggregated there is severe packet loss and time outs on the network with this server. ALso, the SG commands like cmviewcl, cmviewconf takes a lot of time than the usual to give an output...
Iam not sure whether all these problems are inter-related...PLEASE HELP!!!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-04-2002 06:33 PM
02-04-2002 06:33 PM
Re: Weird Problem!!!
And what happens when you remove the new node from the cluster, does everything go back to normal?
>>>> WHen the auto port aggregation is down..there is no packet loss..but when its aggregated there is severe packet loss and time outs on the network with this server.<<<<
No packet loss where, on the 7th (new) node?
>>>>ALso, the SG commands like cmviewcl, cmviewconf takes a lot of time than the usual to give an output...<<<<
How are you trying to run and display these commands (via network using X or ascii display like the console)?
What OS are you running, and what patch level?
What servers make up your nodes?
What kind of network cards are you APA'ing?
Maybe, if I ask enough questions, someone else can chime in with some other ideas?
live free or die
harry
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-04-2002 07:41 PM
02-04-2002 07:41 PM
Re: Weird Problem!!!
For maximum reliability, change all switch ports and all LAN cards to manual setting: 100 Mbit full duplex.
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-05-2002 06:40 AM
02-05-2002 06:40 AM
Re: Weird Problem!!!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-05-2002 01:21 PM
02-05-2002 01:21 PM
Re: Weird Problem!!!
Runts are packets that are discarded because they are smaller than the medium's minimum packet size. Any Ethernet packet that is less than 64 bytes is considered a runt.
The above from cisco.com
Runts get created by collisions. The original sender detects that someone else is transmitting so abruptly stops. This creates a unfinished or truncated packet with only a partial header.
You get a major increase in collisions when one end is half and the other end is full since the full end doesn't listen before transmitting and will step all over the half duplex sender.
Ron
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-06-2002 09:20 PM
02-06-2002 09:20 PM