- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- workstation lockup
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-18-2002 08:50 PM
03-18-2002 08:50 PM
workstation lockup
I bring another one (same configuration and appliaction, never lockup) from other site,
sofar, it have not such problem, but I noticed it became slower or slower, it take very longer and longer to reply ICMP ping, if you disconnect lan cable and then put is back, the speed will resotred, I find usally there are one packet take much longer time(500 times) within 5 or more packet, the remain packet act normal, I belived if don't reconnect cable ,it will lockup at last.
thank for any suggestion
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-18-2002 08:59 PM
03-18-2002 08:59 PM
Re: workstation lockup
Sounds like you NIC card is experiencing a problem with auto port negotiation. Do you have Half or full duplex? What is the setting on the switch?
If you run 'lanadmin' and look for the statistics on late collisions, this will most likely tell the the problem on the above, if there are quite a number.
Michael
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-18-2002 10:32 PM
03-18-2002 10:32 PM
Re: workstation lockup
I have check the statistic vai lanadmin,the late collisions value is very low, but the defreed transmission number is incresing.
but currently the performance is quite well, I still don't know which action will lead the degread of speed, only thing is sure, if it became slow, it will slower and slower untill you reconncet the LAN cable.
thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-18-2002 11:57 PM
03-18-2002 11:57 PM
Re: workstation lockup
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-19-2002 02:11 AM
03-19-2002 02:11 AM
Re: workstation lockup
for info. you need
there are only one dumb HUB, no switch avaliable,for patch, they just apply basic patch.
there are serverl WS in this ring network,all these is same(both software and hardware),they login two remote server.two of them is ok, two will lockup accedentily.
the below text is I find in HP site, it sound helpful for me, but I still don't know how to change the setting,router or WS.
A5346115/TRAK-ACTIVE/English] A5346115 Cisco Router: Message to increase LLC timers; recommendations Problem Description I have a Cisco 4500 router with dlsw. I am receiving a message to increase LLC timers. Performance is slow. Should I increase the llc2 t1-time? Configuration Info Operating System - HP-UX Version - Hardware System - HP9000 Series - Solution Yes, the error indicates is that the T1 timer (ack timer) popped. Increasing the ack timers (T1) should decrease the likelihood of a failure. LLC Timer Recommendations Using SRB Over Slow Serial Links ---------------------------------------------------------- The following recommendations are for timer settings on the hosts in a remote source route bridged environment: T1 - 1 to 2 seconds is the normal default. This should be greater than the total round trip delay time that the frame might encounter within the sending node, the network, and the receiving node. On slower WAN links (< 64K or < 256K on heavily used links), T1 should probably be 3 to 3.5 seconds to reduce retransmissions and connection timeouts. Ti - This value is recommended as being at least 10 times the T1 timer. Try values around 30 for best results. You usually don't need to change this setting. Ti expiration causes an RR to be transmitted, and then a T1 timer is started against the RR. T2 - This normally should be between 80 and 256 msec, and must be less than T1. This is not generally tuned. If it is too long, it could hurt response times and cause unnecessary retransmissions. Notes ----- In a locally acknowledged environment, it is not usually necessary to tune T1, Ti or T2 timers unless a frame is traversing numerous local bridges or routers. T1 = how long a device waits for a reply to a transmitted frame. Ti = inactivity timeout. This is like a session keep alive timer. If a link station hasn't heard from a device with which it has a session for the length of time defined by this timer, the link station will send an RR to see if the device is still reachable. T2 = acknowledgment delay timer. This value defines the maximum time after receiving a packet before responding. The above information is from http://www.cisco.com/. xx