- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- XNTPD - Is this normal?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-08-2006 07:22 PM
01-08-2006 07:22 PM
XNTPD - Is this normal?
Need some help on xntpd messages found in the /var/adm/syslog/syslog.log.
We have a HP R-390 server (HPUX 10.20) connected to a HP 58503B GPS Time and Frequency Reference Receiver. The R-390 itself is a ntp server using GPS receiver as it's time source.
The recent leap second issue made us scrutinised the syslog more carefully for ntp related messages.
We found that even prior to Jan 1 2006, multiple xntpd 'syncronisation lost' and 'syncronised' messages were logged every few hours. Below is a part of the messages found. For more details please refer to attached file.
Dec 24 11:26:53 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronisation lost
Dec 24 11:26:54 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to LOCAL(1), stratum=3
Dec 24 11:28:04 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to GPS_HP(1), stratum=0
Dec 24 15:20:29 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronisation lost
Dec 24 15:20:30 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to LOCAL(1), stratum=3
Dec 24 15:21:40 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to GPS_HP(1), stratum=0
Dec 24 15:32:29 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronisation lost
Dec 24 15:32:36 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to LOCAL(1), stratum=3
Dec 24 15:33:40 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to GPS_HP(1), stratum=0
Dec 24 15:39:57 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronisation lost
Dec 24 15:40:04 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to LOCAL(1), stratum=3
Dec 24 15:49:24 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to GPS_HP(1), stratum=0
Dec 24 15:50:05 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronisation lost
Dec 24 15:50:12 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to LOCAL(1), stratum=3
Dec 24 16:02:28 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to GPS_HP(1), stratum=0
Dec 24 16:03:09 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronisation lost
Dec 24 16:03:10 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to LOCAL(1), stratum=3
Dec 24 16:06:12 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to GPS_HP(1), stratum=0
Dec 24 16:07:41 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronisation lost
Dec 24 16:07:48 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to LOCAL(1), stratum=3
Dec 24 16:12:52 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to GPS_HP(1), stratum=0
Dec 24 16:16:13 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronisation lost
Dec 24 16:16:20 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to LOCAL(1), stratum=3
Dec 24 16:17:24 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to GPS_HP(1), stratum=0
Dec 24 16:33:49 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronisation lost
Dec 24 16:33:56 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to LOCAL(1), stratum=3
Dec 24 16:35:00 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to GPS_HP(1), stratum=0
Dec 24 16:38:21 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronisation lost
Dec 24 16:38:22 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to LOCAL(1), stratum=3
Dec 24 16:39:48 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to GPS_HP(1), stratum=0
Dec 25 05:58:53 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronisation lost
Dec 25 05:59:00 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to LOCAL(1), stratum=3
Dec 25 06:00:04 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to GPS_HP(1), stratum=0
Dec 25 06:15:25 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronisation lost
Dec 25 06:15:26 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to LOCAL(1), stratum=3
Dec 25 06:16:36 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to GPS_HP(1), stratum=0
Dec 25 06:30:21 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronisation lost
Dec 25 06:30:22 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to LOCAL(1), stratum=3
Dec 25 06:31:48 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to GPS_HP(1), stratum=0
Dec 25 06:33:49 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronisation lost
Dec 25 06:33:56 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to LOCAL(1), stratum=3
Dec 25 06:35:16 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to GPS_HP(1), stratum=0
Dec 25 08:03:09 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronisation lost
Dec 25 08:03:10 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to LOCAL(1), stratum=3
Dec 25 08:04:20 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to GPS_HP(1), stratum=0
Dec 26 04:51:09 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronisation lost
Dec 26 04:51:10 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to LOCAL(1), stratum=3
Dec 26 04:52:20 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to GPS_HP(1), stratum=0
Dec 26 10:33:17 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronisation lost
Dec 26 10:33:24 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to LOCAL(1), stratum=3
Dec 26 10:34:28 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to GPS_HP(1), stratum=0
Dec 26 19:13:49 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronisation lost
Dec 26 19:13:56 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to LOCAL(1), stratum=3
Dec 26 19:15:16 sdf_r11 xntpd[2320]: synchronized to GPS_HP(1), stratum=0
Is this behaviour normal?
Appreciate any englightenment on this issue.
Thanks in advance.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-08-2006 07:40 PM
01-08-2006 07:40 PM
Re: XNTPD - Is this normal?
If the error is from your ntp server then the time synchronization is not proper and it is losing synchronization causing these error messages in the syslog.log.
One possible major reason for this is the lost of link between your server and the reference server. Is this right? You can continuously monitor the link conclude if it is stable or not.
HTH,
Devender
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-08-2006 08:26 PM
01-08-2006 08:26 PM
Re: XNTPD - Is this normal?
Normal? No.
Critical? No.
Networking between the ntp server and your box may have been lost. The ntp server may be an old microsoft box that does not comply with unix standards.
You should have this checked.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-08-2006 09:14 PM
01-08-2006 09:14 PM
Re: XNTPD - Is this normal?
Just to clarify.
The system is a HP R-390 server running on HPUX 10.20. It is connected thru RS-232 to a HP GPS receiver.
The system is configured as a ntp server using the GPS receiver as the reference source.
Any idea why synchronisation can be lost using a standard RS-232 cable?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-08-2006 09:25 PM
01-08-2006 09:25 PM
Re: XNTPD - Is this normal?
replace the cable if you have a spare....
regards.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-10-2006 03:53 PM
01-10-2006 03:53 PM
Re: XNTPD - Is this normal?
As for the serial cable, i've tested it by connecting it to a laptop that has the GPS receiver test program. I'm able to run up the test program, check on the GPS receiver status and even send test commands without problem.
The funny part is that the symptoms will occur every few hours a day.
Any docu on the sync process i can readup on?
I'll like to know what scenarios or events could have resulted in lost of sync.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-10-2006 04:30 PM
01-10-2006 04:30 PM
Re: XNTPD - Is this normal?
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-10-2006 05:31 PM
01-10-2006 05:31 PM
Re: XNTPD - Is this normal?
The test program i used only shows instantenous status of the receiver. No logs were retrievable.
During the afternoon i was checking on the GPS reeiver, I'm seeing consistently 6-7 Sat found by the receiver and GPS lock is active.
Self-tests status on the receiver are all green too.
Is there any document i can refer to for the details of the xntpd sync handshaking?