- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Re: BIND 9 on temp box
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-04-2006 09:09 AM
12-04-2006 09:09 AM
Our 9.2.1 Bind box is going south, and we need to put a temporary in place..
I've installed Fedora on a temporary box, laid the existing named root zone files into the /var/named/chroot/etc including our old named.conf
Get some funky errors about bad owner name (check-names) in /var/log/messages and can't query against new instance of DNS.. Any insight appreciated..
Rex M - unix engineer ESU3 LaVista NE
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-04-2006 10:18 AM
12-04-2006 10:18 AM
SolutionMake sure that 'named' owns all of '/var/named/chroot/*'.
Make sure that '/etc/named.conf' is a symlink to '/var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf'.
Make sure that all your master directories are there in '/var/named/chroot/'.
Make sure that bind is started as a chroot ('/etc/sysconfig/named' has 'ROOTDIR=/var/named/chroot' in it).
If you've got all of this, then paste us your 'named.conf' and show us the errors that show up in '/var/log/messages'.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-05-2006 01:50 AM
12-05-2006 01:50 AM
Re: BIND 9 on temp box
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-05-2006 01:58 AM
12-05-2006 01:58 AM
Re: BIND 9 on temp box
I did a
chown -R root:named /var/named/chroot
I've modified the named.conf and added the lines:
allow-query { any; };
check-names master ignore;
stopped and restarted the daemon,
getting DNS replys now, Still getting
primary/
I believe our zone files have the following entry,
@ IN SOA ns1.ourdomain.org. dns.ns1.ourdomain.org. (
200611150 ; Serial
43200 ; Refresh - 12 hours
1800 ; Retry - 1 minute
604800 ; Expire - 2 weeks
86400) ; Minimum - 12 hours
Been reading we need a
$TTL 86400 directive.
Does this look copacetic?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-05-2006 09:15 AM
12-05-2006 09:15 AM
Re: BIND 9 on temp box
Other than that, the minimum TTL's look a bit big. This an internal or public domain?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-05-2006 10:06 AM
12-05-2006 10:06 AM
Re: BIND 9 on temp box
We host multiple domains for school districts. Some of the servers within each domain are public / parent access while other parts are restricted access. So we have a mixed bag o' bs. We are putting the temp server in place on Friday and I will rebuild our primary next week with FC6 and BIND 9.3.2xx.. I hope to fix most of the zone records prior to bringing the primary back online.
DNS is not a high priority as long as it is working but heaven forbid some of the local admins take two second to add the secondary into the search :( Many people with static IP's only have the one DNS entry. If they are served DHCP they get the secondary. So now we have to fight the outage battles. grrrr. Needless to say, I hope my manager reinterates in the district advisory meetings where the tech people meet from each school that they "NEED" to add the secondary to their workstation configs..