- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Re: Channel Bonding Module
Categories
Company
Local Language
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- This widget could not be displayed.This widget could not be displayed.This widget could not be displayed.This widget could not be displayed.This widget could not be displayed.This widget could not be displayed.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-14-2004 11:22 PM
07-14-2004 11:22 PM
Channel Bonding Module
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-15-2004 12:01 AM
07-15-2004 12:01 AM
Re: Channel Bonding Module
grep BONDING config-kernelversion
where config version is the version of the kernel.
Of course if you have the config file saved.
Try to find it under /boot or do a search on your file system.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-15-2004 12:21 AM
07-15-2004 12:21 AM
Re: Channel Bonding Module
does this mean I can go ahead and start to config my bonding addresses. This means that I have the module ready to go in the kernel?
# grep BOND /boot/config-2.4.20-8
CONFIG_BONDING=m
CONFIG_WINBOND_840=m
CONFIG_WINBOND_FIR=m
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-15-2004 12:25 AM
07-15-2004 12:25 AM
Re: Channel Bonding Module
insmod bonding
then lsmod
If the previous command didn't give you any error and in the list of lsmod you see bonding -it means that the module is currently loaded to the kernel
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-15-2004 02:41 AM
07-15-2004 02:41 AM
Re: Channel Bonding Module
I have it running OK now. Using 2 nics bonded to bond0. However, I am not seeing faster times through NFS.
I nfs'd a file yesterday @2.1 Gbytes it took 16 minutes.
Today, using a bonded NIC, @2.1 Gbytes took nearly the same, a little faster.
Both test copies are via NFS to the NAS running Linux.
Why dont I see the copy complete in half the time that it took on one nic connection? I expected to see the time drop in 1/2 when I went to a dual nic.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-15-2004 02:45 AM
07-15-2004 02:45 AM
Re: Channel Bonding Module
You have to take in mind also other factors:
Disk speed,controller,etc.