- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Compare bcm5700 vs. tg3
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-17-2006 06:02 PM
тАО08-17-2006 06:02 PM
Compare bcm5700 vs. tg3
Could anybody tell me, what are differences between drivers bcm5700 and tg3. Which one is better for DL380G4?
Regards
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-17-2006 09:04 PM
тАО08-17-2006 09:04 PM
Re: Compare bcm5700 vs. tg3
Just one thing : the bcm5700 provided by the genuine Linux kernel does not support all BroadCom chipsets. Then I presume you are trying to compare bcm5700 provided by HP with tg3 from the genuine kernel.
For normal usage, there seems to be no difference between tg3 and bcm5700. But in the past, there used to be some differences in bonding configuration, or network crash dump functionality (RedHat's netdump).
You can download a [custo|opti]mized version of tg3 from HP web site :
http://h18004.www1.hp.com/support/files/server/us/download/25099.html
Good lcuk.
Kodjo
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-17-2006 10:55 PM
тАО08-17-2006 10:55 PM
Re: Compare bcm5700 vs. tg3
tg3 is a module for the NIC card that comes by default with redhat linux for broadcom NIC's but in most of the cases you will have a connectivity lost issues after some time if you use tg3.
In this case we need to use the bcm57xx modules that have been provided by broadcom itself.
Cheers
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-17-2006 11:08 PM
тАО08-17-2006 11:08 PM
Re: Compare bcm5700 vs. tg3
I've been forced to use both and had very littl e variance in the actual results. bcm5700 was not built into earlier Linux kernels so on older Red Hat releases, I use tg3.
Practically speaking, I can do bonding on either driver and notice absolutely no difference in performance an reliablity.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-17-2006 11:08 PM
тАО08-17-2006 11:08 PM
Re: Compare bcm5700 vs. tg3
I've been forced to use both and had very littl e variance in the actual results. bcm5700 was not built into earlier Linux kernels so on older Red Hat releases, I use tg3.
Practically speaking, I can do bonding on either driver and notice absolutely no difference in performance an reliablity. This is with Red Hat 4. Red Hat 3 makes bonding a little harder, but it can be done with either driver.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-18-2006 12:10 AM
тАО08-18-2006 12:10 AM
Re: Compare bcm5700 vs. tg3
I have asked, because I had big problem with tg3. Since on server worked a couple of employees everythinks works ok, but when I switched all samba shares from old server to new one, problems become.
Yesterday I changed tg3 to bcm5700 (from hp.com) and now server is working smoothly.
Regards
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-21-2006 04:22 AM
тАО08-21-2006 04:22 AM
Re: Compare bcm5700 vs. tg3
Hewlett-Packard are following Broadcom's lead on that one.
If you are experiencing problems with tg3, it would probably be a good idea to excercise your official support channels.