HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- I/O performance problem on BL465c /SLES9 with SATA...
Operating System - Linux
1827807
Members
2622
Online
109969
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-15-2008 01:22 AM
04-15-2008 01:22 AM
I/O performance problem on BL465c /SLES9 with SATA disks
Has anybody had a similar problem? (see details below)
========================
- they compare dl385/U320 with bl465c and sas internal disks running sles9 sp3
- the write performance degrades of a factor 4x when doing a copy from one partition to another, while the read performance is OK
- the degradation is related to a driver under SuSE 9.3, and a rewritten driver on SuSE 10.0 fixes the problem
- they still need to run sles9
- on sles9 a special patch didn't fix (see below)
- I assume obvious things like battery write cache installed have been verified
- they use ext3.
=====================
The drivers attached with you mail didn't work on AMD64 architecture. No matter, I found them on the HP site.
As you can see on the tests below, results are not so good. With SAS disk and the new driver, performances depend on the cache efficiency. In development environment, the cache is not used more than 10% when datas are written on disks.
1. Tests results based on a copy of /usr
1.1. On servers with SCSI U320 disks
Hostname: ncegcolnx04
Server model: ProLiant DL145 G1
Disk model: SCSI 72Go U320
kernel version: 2.6.5-7.201-smp
Driver version: HP CISS Driver (v 2.6.6)
Load Average: 0.01
/usr size: 2506 MB
Total time: 104.64 seconds
write perf.: 23.949 MB/s
Hostname: ncegcolnx18
Server model: ProLiant DL385 G1
Disk model: SCSI 300Go U320
kernel version: 2.6.5-7.201-smp
Driver version: HP CISS Driver (v 2.6.6)
Load Average: 0.23
/usr size: 2455 MB
Total time: 57.05 seconds
write perf.: 43.576 MB/s
Hostname: ncegcolnx51
Server model: ProLiant BL25p G1
Disk model: SCSI 300Go U320
kernel version: 2.6.5-7.201-smp
Driver version: HP CISS Driver (v 2.6.6)
Load Average: 0.13
/usr size: 2600 MB
Total time: 54.18 seconds
write perf.: 47.988 MB/s
1.2. On servers with SAS disks
Hostname: ncegcolnx75
Server model: ProLiant BL465c G1
Disk model: SAS 146Go
kernel version: 2.6.5-7.244-smp
Driver version: HP CISS Driver (v 2.6.16-5)
Load Average: 3.13
/usr size: 2422 MB
Total time: 261.18 seconds
write perf.: 9.273 MB/s
1.2. With new driver given by HP
Hostname: ncegcolnx75
Server model: ProLiant BL465c G1
Disk model: SAS 146Go
kernel version: 2.6.5-7.244-smp
Driver version: HP CISS Driver (v 2.6.18-10)
Load Average: 0.20
/usr size: 2422 MB
Total time: from 340.64 to 23.51 seconds (cache efficiency)
write perf.: from 7.110 to 103.019 MB/s (cache efficiency)
2. Script used for these tests
#!/usr/bin/zsh
#2008-04-04
server_name=`hostname`
model=`hwinfo|grep 'Product: "'|cut -d: -f2`
kernel=`uname -r`
driver_version=`strings /lib/modules/$kernel/kernel/drivers/block/cciss.ko | grep 'HP CISS'`
load=`cat /proc/loadavg|cut -d\ -f1`
echo "
Hostname: $server_name
Server model: $model
kernel version: $kernel
Driver version: $driver_version
Load Average: $load"
size_m=$(( `du -sk /usr|awk '{print $1}'`/1024 ))
/usr/bin/time -o /tmp/time_result -f "%e" cp -rp /usr /data/usr_copy_test
time_s=`cat /tmp/time_result`
m_s=$(( $size_m/$time_s ))
echo " /usr size: $size_m MB
Total time: $time_s seconds
write perf.: $m_s MB/s"
rm /tmp/time_result
rm -r /data/usr_copy_test
========================
- they compare dl385/U320 with bl465c and sas internal disks running sles9 sp3
- the write performance degrades of a factor 4x when doing a copy from one partition to another, while the read performance is OK
- the degradation is related to a driver under SuSE 9.3, and a rewritten driver on SuSE 10.0 fixes the problem
- they still need to run sles9
- on sles9 a special patch didn't fix (see below)
- I assume obvious things like battery write cache installed have been verified
- they use ext3.
=====================
The drivers attached with you mail didn't work on AMD64 architecture. No matter, I found them on the HP site.
As you can see on the tests below, results are not so good. With SAS disk and the new driver, performances depend on the cache efficiency. In development environment, the cache is not used more than 10% when datas are written on disks.
1. Tests results based on a copy of /usr
1.1. On servers with SCSI U320 disks
Hostname: ncegcolnx04
Server model: ProLiant DL145 G1
Disk model: SCSI 72Go U320
kernel version: 2.6.5-7.201-smp
Driver version: HP CISS Driver (v 2.6.6)
Load Average: 0.01
/usr size: 2506 MB
Total time: 104.64 seconds
write perf.: 23.949 MB/s
Hostname: ncegcolnx18
Server model: ProLiant DL385 G1
Disk model: SCSI 300Go U320
kernel version: 2.6.5-7.201-smp
Driver version: HP CISS Driver (v 2.6.6)
Load Average: 0.23
/usr size: 2455 MB
Total time: 57.05 seconds
write perf.: 43.576 MB/s
Hostname: ncegcolnx51
Server model: ProLiant BL25p G1
Disk model: SCSI 300Go U320
kernel version: 2.6.5-7.201-smp
Driver version: HP CISS Driver (v 2.6.6)
Load Average: 0.13
/usr size: 2600 MB
Total time: 54.18 seconds
write perf.: 47.988 MB/s
1.2. On servers with SAS disks
Hostname: ncegcolnx75
Server model: ProLiant BL465c G1
Disk model: SAS 146Go
kernel version: 2.6.5-7.244-smp
Driver version: HP CISS Driver (v 2.6.16-5)
Load Average: 3.13
/usr size: 2422 MB
Total time: 261.18 seconds
write perf.: 9.273 MB/s
1.2. With new driver given by HP
Hostname: ncegcolnx75
Server model: ProLiant BL465c G1
Disk model: SAS 146Go
kernel version: 2.6.5-7.244-smp
Driver version: HP CISS Driver (v 2.6.18-10)
Load Average: 0.20
/usr size: 2422 MB
Total time: from 340.64 to 23.51 seconds (cache efficiency)
write perf.: from 7.110 to 103.019 MB/s (cache efficiency)
2. Script used for these tests
#!/usr/bin/zsh
#2008-04-04
server_name=`hostname`
model=`hwinfo|grep 'Product: "'|cut -d: -f2`
kernel=`uname -r`
driver_version=`strings /lib/modules/$kernel/kernel/drivers/block/cciss.ko | grep 'HP CISS'`
load=`cat /proc/loadavg|cut -d\ -f1`
echo "
Hostname: $server_name
Server model: $model
kernel version: $kernel
Driver version: $driver_version
Load Average: $load"
size_m=$(( `du -sk /usr|awk '{print $1}'`/1024 ))
/usr/bin/time -o /tmp/time_result -f "%e" cp -rp /usr /data/usr_copy_test
time_s=`cat /tmp/time_result`
m_s=$(( $size_m/$time_s ))
echo " /usr size: $size_m MB
Total time: $time_s seconds
write perf.: $m_s MB/s"
rm /tmp/time_result
rm -r /data/usr_copy_test
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP