Operating System - Linux
1828784 Members
3075 Online
109985 Solutions
New Discussion

kmod:failed to exec /sbin/modprobe

 
SOLVED
Go to solution
Ronald Cogen
Frequent Advisor

kmod:failed to exec /sbin/modprobe

I Have installed SuSELinux EnterpriseEdition8.
During the boot process I get the following message: kmod: failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k scsl host adapter, error=2.
What does this mean? Is it dangerous?
I've been down so long it looks like up to me
4 REPLIES 4
Mark Grant
Honored Contributor
Solution

Re: kmod:failed to exec /sbin/modprobe

error 2 means that the file doesn't exist. See if you actually have a "modprobe" in /sbin.

If you don't, it means you haven't installed a package that perhaps you should have.
Never preceed any demonstration with anything more predictive than "watch this"
Stuart Browne
Honored Contributor

Re: kmod:failed to exec /sbin/modprobe

Does this system use an 'initrd' boot process?

If it does, it might be that it's missing in there.

It's also possible that the modules 'scsi host adapter' is missing (are you sure there's spaces, and not _'s?). Check for references in '/etc/modules.conf' for this.
One long-haired git at your service...
Martin P.J. Zinser
Honored Contributor

Re: kmod:failed to exec /sbin/modprobe

Just checked my SuSE system. modprobe does live in /sbin, so either the installation is broken or the module that it tries to insert has not been installed. -s means reporting to syslog -k is a mode used by the kernel. So the real interesting part would be the next and that looks garbled in your post ;-) Try to get a good error please.

Greetings, Martin
Ronald Cogen
Frequent Advisor

Re: kmod:failed to exec /sbin/modprobe

Thank you Mark and STuart, I'll look into that as soon as I'm at that site.

Martin: I'm not sure about what you meant by 'garbled'. I'm pretty sure I wrote the error message down the way it came. If you have a moment, could you fill me in?
I've been down so long it looks like up to me