- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Linux performance - Please suggest.
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-13-2008 05:46 PM
02-13-2008 05:46 PM
Linux performance - Please suggest.
Please give your suggestion or opinion.
We are running grep command on a 256MB file from a diskless client (SuSE) and the VMware virtual machine (RHEL4, VM is on ESX host). The file resides on an NFS share and both the servers have NFS share mounted on them. With respect to resources (CPU - 1 X 2GHz & memory - 1GB), both are similar.
The diskless client is better off than the VMware virtual machine. Find below the details:
Diskless client
===============
time grep -c "MESSAGES"
/crawls/crawl02/bviewer-new/boards/www.weightwatchers.com/boardviewer.script | sort | uniq -c
1 5394438
real 0m1.229s
user 0m1.080s
sys 0m0.150s
VMware Virtual Machine
======================
time grep -c "MESSAGES"
/crawls/bviewer-sync/boards/www.weightwatchers.com/boardviewer.script | sort | uniq -c
1 5394438
real 0m23.688s
user 0m23.112s
sys 0m0.520s
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-13-2008 07:12 PM
02-13-2008 07:12 PM
Re: Linux performance - Please suggest.
At no time have you said how big the 'boardviewer.script' file is. Nor have you stated how busy the network is, or what sort of network connections are in use.
You've also not said how much memory each machine is currently using, or is swapped on each device.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-14-2008 05:18 AM
02-14-2008 05:18 AM
Re: Linux performance - Please suggest.
Al I/O is going through the host system. I am not surprised at all with the results. I'm guessing the host OS is Windows which is using a lot of system resources for itself.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-14-2008 03:53 PM
02-14-2008 03:53 PM
Re: Linux performance - Please suggest.
But remember, there's a virtualization layer. All the I/O process in virtualization are lower then the bare-metal. Virtualization was designed for better utilization of procs, memory and disks, not for performance.
Rgds
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-15-2008 05:21 AM
02-15-2008 05:21 AM
Re: Linux performance - Please suggest.
you are sharing resources to start with, the devices presented in your VM are 'virtual' as well.
could be that there are some params you can tune in the RH running in a VM to make it perform better, but i wouldn't count in it too much.