- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Re: Physical Writes is more than Physical Reads?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-19-2004 07:02 PM
тАО01-19-2004 07:02 PM
I use perf. agent v4 to collect performance data on the Linux AS V2.1 server with Oracle 8.1.7. The system is never been tuned and I find the number of phy. writes is more than phy. reads, refer with attach file. Does anyone know why the phy. writes is more than phy. reads? How to make the phy. reads more than phy. writes?
Best Regards,
Eric
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-19-2004 08:38 PM
тАО01-19-2004 08:38 PM
Re: Physical Writes is more than Physical Reads?
Can be that Oracle needs to write changes and store read files in a stack (or in RAM), so reading the same datas quite often doesn't imply physicial read access to disk, but write does.
You can tune these parameters, if you feel it necessary, with the elvtune command :
/sbin/elvtune -r 1024 -w 2048 /dev/hda3
will require 1024 cycles latency between 2 reads, and 2048 cycles between 2 writes on hda3.
r should be about half write value to optimize head moves on the disk (storing writes on a stack).
You may then perform a bench moving these values to check if it improves disk speed.
hth
J
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-20-2004 10:02 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-20-2004 10:04 AM
тАО01-20-2004 10:04 AM
Re: Physical Writes is more than Physical Reads?
one more thing: Be happy, when physical reads are few. Look for logical reads to see, how well tuned your instance is.
Michael
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-20-2004 01:57 PM
тАО01-20-2004 01:57 PM
Re: Physical Writes is more than Physical Reads?
Thanks your reply,I find the Oracle buffer cache hit ratio is negative:
Consistent_Gets DB_Blk_Gets Physical_Reads Hit_Ratio
4,907,767,584 252,769,373 5,789,148,480 -12.181
The phy._read is more than consistent_get that means Oracle doesn't use buffer cache!
What's something wrong?
Best Regards,
Eric
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-21-2004 01:27 AM
тАО01-21-2004 01:27 AM
Re: Physical Writes is more than Physical Reads?
I have ran into your posting on metalink. ;-)
I have found something here, which you should read. Perhaps it is related to your case:
http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=33883.1
greetings,
Michael
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-22-2004 01:00 AM
тАО01-22-2004 01:00 AM
Re: Physical Writes is more than Physical Reads?
Thanks your reply, I use the common method to get the hit_ratio:
select sum(decode(NAME, 'consistent gets',VALUE, 0)),
sum(decode(NAME, 'db block gets',VALUE, 0)),
sum(decode(NAME, 'physical reads',VALUE, 0)),
round((sum(decode(name, 'consistent gets',value, 0)) +
sum(decode(name, 'db block gets',value, 0)) -
sum(decode(name, 'physical reads',value, 0))) /
(sum(decode(name, 'consistent gets',value, 0)) +
sum(decode(name, 'db block gets',value, 0))) * 100,2)
from sys.v_$sysstat;
I only use "default" pool,no any keep or recycle pool buffer!
Best Regards,
Eric