HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Re: problem with Bind 9
Operating System - Linux
1831672
Members
1935
Online
110029
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-08-2004 04:06 AM
01-08-2004 04:06 AM
problem with Bind 9
hi
I'm using DNS Server BIND 9.2.2 on linux SuSE 8.2 as an internal DNS server with DDNS for ca. 200 WIN2000 clients.
DDNS is working. WIN2000 DHCP Server 10.41.1.150 register all WIN2000 clients by DNS as forward and reverse, but some IP have 2 entries in the master reverse zone, for example:
# nslookup 10.41.2.2
Server: 127.0.0.1
Address: 127.0.0.1#53
2.2.41.10.in-addr.arpa name = nzh12091.
2.2.41.10.in-addr.arpa name = WK1200.blue.net.
in the master forward zone is only one entry !
why happens that ?
my BIND config file (named.conf):
options {
directory "/var/lib/named";
multiple-cnames no;
cleaning-interval 60;
datasize default;
stacksize default;
coresize default;
files unlimited;
# recursion yes;
listen-on port 53 { 10.41.1.10; };
listen-on-v6 { any; };
#allow-query { 127.0.0.1; };
notify no;
};
zone "." in {
type hint;
file "root.hint";
};
zone "localhost" in {
type master;
file "localhost.zone";
};
zone "0.0.127.in-addr.arpa" in {
type master;
file "127.0.0.zone";
};
# You can insert further zone records for your own domains below.
zone "ns1.blue.net" {
type master;
file "/var/lib/named/ns1.blue.net.hosts";
also-notify {
192.168.0.5;
};
};
zone "blue.net" {
type master;
file "/var/lib/named/blue.net.hosts";
allow-update {
10.41.0.0/22;
10.181.0.0/16;
192.168.0.0/24;
192.168.110.0/24;
192.168.111.0/24;
192.168.112.0/24;
192.168.113.0/24;
127.0.0.1;
};
also-notify {
192.168.0.5;
};
};
zone "0.41.10.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
file "/var/lib/named/10.41.0.rev";
allow-update {
10.41.0.0/22;
127.0.0.1;
};
also-notify {
192.168.0.5;
};
};
zone "1.41.10.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
file "/var/lib/named/10.41.1.rev";
allow-update {
10.41.0.0/22;
127.0.0.1;
};
also-notify {
192.168.0.5;
};
};
zone "2.41.10.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
file "/var/lib/named/10.41.2.rev";
allow-update {
10.41.1.150;
127.0.0.1;
};
also-notify {
192.168.0.5;
};
};
zone "3.41.10.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
file "/var/lib/named/10.41.3.rev";
allow-update {
10.41.0.0/22;
127.0.0.1;
};
also-notify {
192.168.0.5;
};
};
kind regards
chris
I'm using DNS Server BIND 9.2.2 on linux SuSE 8.2 as an internal DNS server with DDNS for ca. 200 WIN2000 clients.
DDNS is working. WIN2000 DHCP Server 10.41.1.150 register all WIN2000 clients by DNS as forward and reverse, but some IP have 2 entries in the master reverse zone, for example:
# nslookup 10.41.2.2
Server: 127.0.0.1
Address: 127.0.0.1#53
2.2.41.10.in-addr.arpa name = nzh12091.
2.2.41.10.in-addr.arpa name = WK1200.blue.net.
in the master forward zone is only one entry !
why happens that ?
my BIND config file (named.conf):
options {
directory "/var/lib/named";
multiple-cnames no;
cleaning-interval 60;
datasize default;
stacksize default;
coresize default;
files unlimited;
# recursion yes;
listen-on port 53 { 10.41.1.10; };
listen-on-v6 { any; };
#allow-query { 127.0.0.1; };
notify no;
};
zone "." in {
type hint;
file "root.hint";
};
zone "localhost" in {
type master;
file "localhost.zone";
};
zone "0.0.127.in-addr.arpa" in {
type master;
file "127.0.0.zone";
};
# You can insert further zone records for your own domains below.
zone "ns1.blue.net" {
type master;
file "/var/lib/named/ns1.blue.net.hosts";
also-notify {
192.168.0.5;
};
};
zone "blue.net" {
type master;
file "/var/lib/named/blue.net.hosts";
allow-update {
10.41.0.0/22;
10.181.0.0/16;
192.168.0.0/24;
192.168.110.0/24;
192.168.111.0/24;
192.168.112.0/24;
192.168.113.0/24;
127.0.0.1;
};
also-notify {
192.168.0.5;
};
};
zone "0.41.10.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
file "/var/lib/named/10.41.0.rev";
allow-update {
10.41.0.0/22;
127.0.0.1;
};
also-notify {
192.168.0.5;
};
};
zone "1.41.10.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
file "/var/lib/named/10.41.1.rev";
allow-update {
10.41.0.0/22;
127.0.0.1;
};
also-notify {
192.168.0.5;
};
};
zone "2.41.10.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
file "/var/lib/named/10.41.2.rev";
allow-update {
10.41.1.150;
127.0.0.1;
};
also-notify {
192.168.0.5;
};
};
zone "3.41.10.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
file "/var/lib/named/10.41.3.rev";
allow-update {
10.41.0.0/22;
127.0.0.1;
};
also-notify {
192.168.0.5;
};
};
kind regards
chris
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-04-2004 08:16 PM
04-04-2004 08:16 PM
Re: problem with Bind 9
hi,
first check ur /etc/resolve.conf
the prober entry like
nameserver
first check ur /etc/resolve.conf
the prober entry like
nameserver
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-05-2004 06:54 PM
04-05-2004 06:54 PM
Re: problem with Bind 9
Hi ,
It seems that the host WK1200.blue.net has hostname alias as nzh12091. check that system's hostname config and try removing aliases.
regards,
U.SivaKumar.
It seems that the host WK1200.blue.net has hostname alias as nzh12091. check that system's hostname config and try removing aliases.
regards,
U.SivaKumar.
Innovations are made when conventions are broken
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP