- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Problems with frame sizes over VPN
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-16-2003 06:57 AM
04-16-2003 06:57 AM
Problems with frame sizes over VPN
I'm dealing with a Cisco powered VPN and I'm experiencing a few problems.
Here is the setup:
LAN---(eth0)GATEWAY(eth2)--VPN BOX----Internet--Customer
The above setup has been tested and works fine. Gateway is running redhat v8.
The problem I am having is when hosts from the LAN try to telnet to machines on the other side of the VPN.
The gateway is routing and masquerading their connections so this way all connections from the LAN seem to be coming from the GATEWAY host.
Since this is a VPN, the MTU is a very critical factor. Gateway;s eth2 interface, its been set to 1400. With this value everything works fine.
However, on eth0 its set to 1500 (default) and this is where the problems occur.
When I try to telnet from the LAN to the other side of the VPN, I can log in, but when I try to run Pine or do a 'ls', because the data to be transfered back to me is a lot, the session hangs.
At this point the only solution I can think of is to set eth0's mtu to 1400 but Im trying to avoid this. Is there any way I can setup the Gateway to perform its routing in a smarter way ?
Things to take in cosideration:
a)I do not want to chage the mtu's on any of the LAN hosts
b) I want to avoid changing Gateway's eth0 mtu to 1400.
Thanking you in advanced.
Chris P.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-17-2003 09:30 AM
04-17-2003 09:30 AM
Re: Problems with frame sizes over VPN
Have you run ethereal on the gateway to trace the activity? Just to confirm that the conversion is taking place.
Is there anything else running on the gateway that might take away CPU cycles from the network packet handling?
I'd want to confirm the behavior and then hammer redhat if it is not behaving as expected.
What you have described should work with the gateway rebuilding the large packets, and just passing through the smaller data from the customer.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-17-2003 09:10 PM
04-17-2003 09:10 PM
Re: Problems with frame sizes over VPN
Run these commands and see whether it makes any difference.
#echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_no_pmtu_disc
#echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_always_defrag
#service network restart
Try VPN again.
regards,
U.SivaKumar
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-25-2003 12:22 AM
04-25-2003 12:22 AM
Re: Problems with frame sizes over VPN
The other possiblity is to modify the route with a smaller packet size. You can modify this behaviour by assigning a specific packet size to the route command. So the packet size affects only this connection and not the whole adapter packet size.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-05-2003 06:23 AM
05-05-2003 06:23 AM
Re: Problems with frame sizes over VPN
Our VPN is a Cisco, and we did go to 1400, when we had similar issues. It seemed the path of least resistance. I know that it is a major pain.
We had Cisco here to set up a demonstrator, and we bought into it. Last thoing I know we did was to change MTU to 1400 from 1500.
Tim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-09-2003 02:20 AM
05-09-2003 02:20 AM
Re: Problems with frame sizes over VPN
This way a host or server can adjust their MTU size depending on the icmp notification they get.
Cheers,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-11-2003 11:05 PM
05-11-2003 11:05 PM
Re: Problems with frame sizes over VPN
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-21-2003 04:37 AM
08-21-2003 04:37 AM
Re: Problems with frame sizes over VPN
I'm sure linux can do this too.