1825667 Members
4280 Online
109686 Solutions
New Discussion

RHEL 4.0 or RHEL 5.0

 
girishb
Frequent Advisor

RHEL 4.0 or RHEL 5.0

Hi,

We are looking to deploy Redhat Enterprise Linux with database on HP DL580 Servers.

We would like to know RHEL 4.0 is best or RHEL 5.0 (latest release)

I know RHEL 5.0 is recently released in the market with virtualization feature...

How can we justify which OS is better and stable.

Thanks for the quick response.

Giri
7 REPLIES 7
Tim Rotunda
Frequent Advisor

Re: RHEL 4.0 or RHEL 5.0

What db will you be deploying?
Tim
Ivan Ferreira
Honored Contributor

Re: RHEL 4.0 or RHEL 5.0

For now, you should Stay with RHEL 4.0 until the products get certified in RHEL 5. Oracle for example is not yet certified for RHEL 5. If you are going to use mysql, postgresql, you can run RHEL 5.

Virtualization is an interesting feature, only if you are planing to use it.
Por que hacerlo dificil si es posible hacerlo facil? - Why do it the hard way, when you can do it the easy way?
Jarle Bjorgeengen
Trusted Contributor

Re: RHEL 4.0 or RHEL 5.0

Stay with RHEL4 unless you need xen-virtualiazition.

It's pretty obvious that RHEL4 is going to be more stable in production, given the maturity of RHEL4. History shows that i thakes 2-3 updates of new OS release to become stable enough for critical production.

FYI: xen is also coming with the next RHEL4 updadate , RHEL 4.5 (they've changed the versioning scheme .)




Steven E. Protter
Exalted Contributor

Re: RHEL 4.0 or RHEL 5.0

Shalom Giri,

In pre-release I found virtualization to be completely unstable.

I found the early releases of RH to be extremely unstable and unreliable. It wasn't until Update 2 until I found them stable enough to use.

I work extensively with RH and find their quality control to be wanting.

I would stay way from RHEL 5 until at least two updates are out.

SEP
Shmuel Protter
NDS Jeruslalem
RHCE

Steven E Protter
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
Court Campbell
Honored Contributor

Re: RHEL 4.0 or RHEL 5.0

stick with RHEL4 for now. If you need virtulization got with SLES. The xen support is better.
"The difference between me and you? I will read the man page." and "Respect the hat." and "You could just do a search on ITRC, you don't need to start a thread on a topic that's been answered 100 times already." Oh, and "What. no points???"
girishb
Frequent Advisor

Re: RHEL 4.0 or RHEL 5.0

Thanks to all for such a good response.

I need to deploy Oracle 10g OCFS on Redhat Linux 4.0 or 5.0

Can some body tell me OCFS is better or GFS.
Court Campbell
Honored Contributor

Re: RHEL 4.0 or RHEL 5.0

Well now you have opened another can of worms. OCFS can only be used on RHAS 2.1 and RHEL3(striclty speaking Red Hat here). PLus I think ASM is what is mainly used nowadays and not OCFS. You could buy GFS, I have heard great things. I assume you are going to implement RAC? If so you may want to look at polyserve:

http://www.polyserve.com/oracle_rac_clusters.php

P.S. don't forget to assign points. I am close to getting my wizard hat.
"The difference between me and you? I will read the man page." and "Respect the hat." and "You could just do a search on ITRC, you don't need to start a thread on a topic that's been answered 100 times already." Oh, and "What. no points???"