HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Storage issue
Operating System - Linux
1828225
Members
2536
Online
109975
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-08-2007 05:17 AM
11-08-2007 05:17 AM
Storage issue
Hi.
I have here a HP ML150 with a sata raid card E200 with BBWC and 4 500GB hd in raid5.
I noticed a very poor performance writing on the disk...i get max 21mbit/s.
I use ext3 over lvm volumes.
With the same setup on an old PIV and no raid i get 40mbit/s.
What's wrong? I use debian etch and kernel 2.6.23.1.
I tried also with different kernels.
Thank you
Pier
I have here a HP ML150 with a sata raid card E200 with BBWC and 4 500GB hd in raid5.
I noticed a very poor performance writing on the disk...i get max 21mbit/s.
I use ext3 over lvm volumes.
With the same setup on an old PIV and no raid i get 40mbit/s.
What's wrong? I use debian etch and kernel 2.6.23.1.
I tried also with different kernels.
Thank you
Pier
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-08-2007 05:28 AM
11-08-2007 05:28 AM
Re: Storage issue
>>> With the same setup on an old PIV and no raid i get 40mbit/s.
What kind of disk?
SATA disks are not the fastest disks, and with RAID 5, you could get worst performance than single disk, because of parity calculation.
What is the speed when you "read" from the disk?
Are you doing the exactly same performance test? Is the system idle?
What kind of disk?
SATA disks are not the fastest disks, and with RAID 5, you could get worst performance than single disk, because of parity calculation.
What is the speed when you "read" from the disk?
Are you doing the exactly same performance test? Is the system idle?
Por que hacerlo dificil si es posible hacerlo facil? - Why do it the hard way, when you can do it the easy way?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-08-2007 05:37 AM
11-08-2007 05:37 AM
Re: Storage issue
Shalom Pier,
I have to agree that more information is needed.
I'd like to know what kind of applications are being run on it. For example an oracle or mysql database with a lot of write activity needs storage to be raid 1. However a mostly read data mine can be raid 5 without difficulty.
The devil may be in the details of the applications, memory settings, database configuration issues (ex oracle SGA) and such.
If your figure is off a network transfer, then network configuration could be a factor.
SEP
I have to agree that more information is needed.
I'd like to know what kind of applications are being run on it. For example an oracle or mysql database with a lot of write activity needs storage to be raid 1. However a mostly read data mine can be raid 5 without difficulty.
The devil may be in the details of the applications, memory settings, database configuration issues (ex oracle SGA) and such.
If your figure is off a network transfer, then network configuration could be a factor.
SEP
Steven E Protter
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-08-2007 08:42 PM
11-08-2007 08:42 PM
Re: Storage issue
Here more details:
the server is doing actually nothing as it's a test server.
i made a bonnie++ test and i got these results:
------Sequential Output------
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite-
K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec
19284 43 19476 5 12608
--Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
%CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
3 36597 74 88286 12 532.4 0
here a dd output:
srv-cluster-1:/home/pier# dd if=/dev/zero of=pppp.img bs=1024 count=3000000
3000000+0 records in
3000000+0 records out
3072000000 bytes (3.1 GB) copied, 149.703 seconds, 20.5 MB/s
These are the result with a file server with 7 500GB hd raid 5 (with different raid card, a 3ware card):
------Sequential Output------
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite-
K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP
53830 98 177074 34 32281 5
--Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
22564 42 51874 3 350.8 0
dd output:
srv-file:/home/pier# dd if=/dev/zero of=pppp.img bs=1024 count=3000000
3000000+0 records in
3000000+0 records out
3072000000 bytes (3.1 GB) copied, 17.538 seconds, 175 MB/s
I mean, i don't expect that hp card to be as fast as the other, but at least give me some decent performance.
The result from the old PIV, are from a normal ide disk i think 40GB big (so pretty old).
Pier
the server is doing actually nothing as it's a test server.
i made a bonnie++ test and i got these results:
------Sequential Output------
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite-
K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec
19284 43 19476 5 12608
--Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
%CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
3 36597 74 88286 12 532.4 0
here a dd output:
srv-cluster-1:/home/pier# dd if=/dev/zero of=pppp.img bs=1024 count=3000000
3000000+0 records in
3000000+0 records out
3072000000 bytes (3.1 GB) copied, 149.703 seconds, 20.5 MB/s
These are the result with a file server with 7 500GB hd raid 5 (with different raid card, a 3ware card):
------Sequential Output------
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite-
K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP
53830 98 177074 34 32281 5
--Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
22564 42 51874 3 350.8 0
dd output:
srv-file:/home/pier# dd if=/dev/zero of=pppp.img bs=1024 count=3000000
3000000+0 records in
3000000+0 records out
3072000000 bytes (3.1 GB) copied, 17.538 seconds, 175 MB/s
I mean, i don't expect that hp card to be as fast as the other, but at least give me some decent performance.
The result from the old PIV, are from a normal ide disk i think 40GB big (so pretty old).
Pier
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP