HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- virtualization solutions with service guard
Operating System - Linux
1827809
Members
2479
Online
109969
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-14-2009 06:22 AM
01-14-2009 06:22 AM
virtualization solutions with service guard
I need to compare 2 solution scenarios:
(a) HP-Integrity/HP-UX/vpars/service guard
and
(b Proliant/Linux/some_virtualization_tool /service guard and or other HA products
Some basic questions:
- would an ISV application run unmodified in a xen-virtualized environment, or would it need modifications (and ISV certification) to take advantage of paravirtualization features?
- when using SGLX, for example to fail over an app from one virtual machines to another and on different cluster nodes, do I have the ability to add or remove cores as in hpux/vpars e.g. to deal with peak loads?
- is there an equivalent of gwlm in linux to automatically adjust fro resource usage?
- are there any other HA products for Linux that offer comparable or superior features than Service Guard for a virtualized environment?
(a) HP-Integrity/HP-UX/vpars/service guard
and
(b Proliant/Linux/some_virtualization_tool /service guard and or other HA products
Some basic questions:
- would an ISV application run unmodified in a xen-virtualized environment, or would it need modifications (and ISV certification) to take advantage of paravirtualization features?
- when using SGLX, for example to fail over an app from one virtual machines to another and on different cluster nodes, do I have the ability to add or remove cores as in hpux/vpars e.g. to deal with peak loads?
- is there an equivalent of gwlm in linux to automatically adjust fro resource usage?
- are there any other HA products for Linux that offer comparable or superior features than Service Guard for a virtualized environment?
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-14-2009 10:32 PM
01-14-2009 10:32 PM
Re: virtualization solutions with service guard
I'll try to answer:
- would an ISV application run unmodified in a xen-virtualized environment, or would it need modifications (and ISV certification) to take advantage of paravirtualization features?
Typically no modification is necessary. ISV certification is up to the ISV.
- when using SGLX, for example to fail over an app from one virtual machines to another and on different cluster nodes, do I have the ability to add or remove cores as in hpux/vpars e.g. to deal with peak loads?
I assume you mean running SGLX in an Integrity VM. Anything that happens at that level is transparent to SGLX.
- is there an equivalent of gwlm in linux to automatically adjust fro resource usage?
No
- are there any other HA products for Linux that offer comparable or superior features than Service Guard for a virtualized environment?
Since I work for HP I won't comment on this question.
- would an ISV application run unmodified in a xen-virtualized environment, or would it need modifications (and ISV certification) to take advantage of paravirtualization features?
Typically no modification is necessary. ISV certification is up to the ISV.
- when using SGLX, for example to fail over an app from one virtual machines to another and on different cluster nodes, do I have the ability to add or remove cores as in hpux/vpars e.g. to deal with peak loads?
I assume you mean running SGLX in an Integrity VM. Anything that happens at that level is transparent to SGLX.
- is there an equivalent of gwlm in linux to automatically adjust fro resource usage?
No
- are there any other HA products for Linux that offer comparable or superior features than Service Guard for a virtualized environment?
Since I work for HP I won't comment on this question.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-15-2009 04:32 AM
01-15-2009 04:32 AM
Re: virtualization solutions with service guard
Shalom,
HP-UX has a totally different virtualization solution. Its not based on the same technology as xen.
To run on different platforms will require some adjustment, and two versions of the application.
The approach, I would recommend trying to write your code application independent. Then you can have a series of wrapper scripts to manage the different environments.
Red Hat Cluster Suite is an excellent suite for high availability that performs the same function on Linux as Serviceguard does on HP-UX. However it does not run on HP-UX.
I have worked with Red Hat Clustering for considerable period of time and with proper testing and release choice, it can assist with high availability issues.
SEP
HP-UX has a totally different virtualization solution. Its not based on the same technology as xen.
To run on different platforms will require some adjustment, and two versions of the application.
The approach, I would recommend trying to write your code application independent. Then you can have a series of wrapper scripts to manage the different environments.
Red Hat Cluster Suite is an excellent suite for high availability that performs the same function on Linux as Serviceguard does on HP-UX. However it does not run on HP-UX.
I have worked with Red Hat Clustering for considerable period of time and with proper testing and release choice, it can assist with high availability issues.
SEP
Steven E Protter
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-13-2009 09:28 AM
04-13-2009 09:28 AM
Re: virtualization solutions with service guard
HP Polyserve on Linux might be a option for virtualized environments.
It is very similar to ServiceGuard but provides a additional feature of a cluster file system. That way your virtual machines will have access to their file system files from any node in the cluster.
There is no VM toolkit that I know of for POlyserve but I know customers are using polyserve clusters to support vmware virtual machines.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP