HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Another OSU problem: .PROTECT
Operating System - OpenVMS
1830203
Members
8840
Online
109999
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-10-2006 11:22 PM
08-10-2006 11:22 PM
I have installed and configured the OSU webserver - logically 100% copy of an older machine in configuration, just a few changes required:
* System authorisation files do not reside on the system disk, for we need to test different VMS versions and this allows us to do so with minimal extra work.
* There is not just OSU, but SWS (and in future, WASD) as well, because we need to check functionality between the webservers. Of course, all aff the system disk.
* The application files (.HTML, .COM and all related) are in one directory that is aliassed (SET FILE/ENTER) into the webserver roots, to have a situaltion that is similar to production.
* This allows us to have webserver confurationfiles equal between the old and new system, where it concerns the web application.
The root of the webaplication is protected by LEVEL2.PROT on both systems, and since the application and it's accesors will be the same, and theer is no chnage in prtection scheme between the two systems, I copied both .PROT files. However, I could not login into the aplication - as I found out, I needed to build cel-auhenticator on the new machien since it wasn't build in the base syetem.
So now it is, but still, when .protect on these locations is in effect, NO ANY username/password is accepted and all acess to the application is denied. The very same configuration on the old machine - including protection scheme, works.
Could this be casued by the fact that the actual SYSUAF is off the system disk? (logical SYSUAF is properly defined (/SYSTEM/EXEC)), or is the fact the root of the application is just an alias?
* System authorisation files do not reside on the system disk, for we need to test different VMS versions and this allows us to do so with minimal extra work.
* There is not just OSU, but SWS (and in future, WASD) as well, because we need to check functionality between the webservers. Of course, all aff the system disk.
* The application files (.HTML, .COM and all related) are in one directory that is aliassed (SET FILE/ENTER) into the webserver roots, to have a situaltion that is similar to production.
* This allows us to have webserver confurationfiles equal between the old and new system, where it concerns the web application.
The root of the webaplication is protected by LEVEL2.PROT on both systems, and since the application and it's accesors will be the same, and theer is no chnage in prtection scheme between the two systems, I copied both .PROT files. However, I could not login into the aplication - as I found out, I needed to build cel-auhenticator on the new machien since it wasn't build in the base syetem.
So now it is, but still, when .protect on these locations is in effect, NO ANY username/password is accepted and all acess to the application is denied. The very same configuration on the old machine - including protection scheme, works.
Could this be casued by the fact that the actual SYSUAF is off the system disk? (logical SYSUAF is properly defined (/SYSTEM/EXEC)), or is the fact the root of the application is just an alias?
Willem Grooters
OpenVMS Developer & System Manager
OpenVMS Developer & System Manager
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-11-2006 12:28 AM
08-11-2006 12:28 AM
Solution
The authenticator image must be installed with privileges, one of the tasks normally done by HTTP_STARTUP.COM. Look at the server's error/trace log to determine if the authenticator is running with SYSPRIV. .prot files used with cel_authenticator should be compatible with the ext_authenticator that replaced it.
The authenticators use the supported $GETUAI API to read SYSUAF and have not problem with it located off the system disk.
The authenticators use the supported $GETUAI API to read SYSUAF and have not problem with it located off the system disk.
I'm looking for marbles all day long.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-11-2006 01:52 AM
08-11-2006 01:52 AM
Re: Another OSU problem: .PROTECT
Is isn't! Nor has HTTP_STARTUP.COM done it. And I found why ;-), but still one question:
HTTP_SYSTARTUP.COM specifies image "ext_autheticator.exe" to be installed and and "ext_autenticator" as a logical. Should both "ext" be replaced by "cel" and what would the logical nee to point to?
(Sorry about my ignorance but I'm new to OSU and need to have it installed in a too short period)
HTTP_SYSTARTUP.COM specifies image "ext_autheticator.exe" to be installed and and "ext_autenticator" as a logical. Should both "ext" be replaced by "cel" and what would the logical nee to point to?
(Sorry about my ignorance but I'm new to OSU and need to have it installed in a too short period)
Willem Grooters
OpenVMS Developer & System Manager
OpenVMS Developer & System Manager
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-11-2006 01:58 AM
08-11-2006 01:58 AM
Re: Another OSU problem: .PROTECT
Never mind.
It works fine with ext_authetication (should have read better)
It works fine with ext_authetication (should have read better)
Willem Grooters
OpenVMS Developer & System Manager
OpenVMS Developer & System Manager
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP