- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: AXP_DNVOSIECO02-V732 checksum?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-01-2005 08:29 AM
11-01-2005 08:29 AM
AXP_DNVOSIECO02-V732 checksum?
Checksum of Compressed Kit: 863420154
I've tried two separate downloads and both times the compressed kit checksummed to: 863411962 . Decompression was successful. Is the listed checksum just incorrect?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-01-2005 08:54 AM
11-01-2005 08:54 AM
Re: AXP_DNVOSIECO02-V732 checksum?
Was fixed by: George Pagliarulo who is responsible for the OpenVMS ECO release process.
email: first.last@hp.com
Dave...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-01-2005 10:42 AM
11-01-2005 10:42 AM
Re: AXP_DNVOSIECO02-V732 checksum?
Unfortunately some methods of calculating checksums include information from the header of the file, which can be changed by the process of transferring the file (for example, losing file attributes). It could also be a stuffup at the HP end.
If the file is supposed to be a PCSI$COMPRESSED kit, make sure it's:
SET FILE/ATTR=(RFM:FIX,MRS:512,LRL:512,RAT:NONE)
This *may* correct the checksum.
There are two purposes for the checksum. First to verify the integrity of the file (did it get corrupted in transit?). The second to protect against malicious modification (has someone planted a trojan in it?).
If you're not concerned with the latter, then the command:
$ PRODUCT LIST prodname /SOURCE=kit-directory
is a quick and simple way to check that the kit is intact, without having to unpack or install it.
If you are concerned about potential security breaches, check with George.
Note that ITRC downloads now include a "patch manifest". This will eventually be used by PCSI to validate the integrity of the patch kit in a future version of OpenVMS.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-01-2005 11:07 AM
11-01-2005 11:07 AM
Re: AXP_DNVOSIECO02-V732 checksum?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-02-2006 06:18 AM
05-02-2006 06:18 AM
Re: AXP_DNVOSIECO02-V732 checksum?
Thanks, John
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-02-2006 07:55 PM
05-02-2006 07:55 PM
Re: AXP_DNVOSIECO02-V732 checksum?
Purely Personal Opinion
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-03-2006 01:31 AM
05-03-2006 01:31 AM