HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Cluster size of large disks
Operating System - OpenVMS
1828220
Members
2095
Online
109975
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-22-2005 11:47 PM
08-22-2005 11:47 PM
Re: Cluster size of large disks
>The application is a third party
>application that uses RMS and I've
>been told that the cluster size must
>be 51 or lower.
Is it that the application requires a cluster size of less than 51, or does the application have hardcoded limit on allocated file size.
I once had tp defrag system disk, using disk to disk image backup restore.
The target disk on my backup disk was very large (about 100gb) and I restored to original system disk with noinit.
Hence the cluster size was now large, (and minimum allocated size)
When I attempted to boot, I received the following: (or similar).
%DECnet-I-LOADED, network base image loaded, version = 05.12.00
%DECnet-W-NOOPEN, could not open SYS$SYSROOT:[SYSEXE]NET$CONFIG.DAT
I logged a call with Compaq, and was reliably informed that, The loader for Decnet base image tries to load net$config.dat, but has a hardcoded file size limit of, I think, 128 blocks. My net$config.dat was larger than 128 blocks. I believe this problem occured on OpenVMS 7.3-1, I don't know if it is still an issue, but my point being that even Compaq/HP designed OS code which could not handle files over a specific hardcoded size.
>application that uses RMS and I've
>been told that the cluster size must
>be 51 or lower.
Is it that the application requires a cluster size of less than 51, or does the application have hardcoded limit on allocated file size.
I once had tp defrag system disk, using disk to disk image backup restore.
The target disk on my backup disk was very large (about 100gb) and I restored to original system disk with noinit.
Hence the cluster size was now large, (and minimum allocated size)
When I attempted to boot, I received the following: (or similar).
%DECnet-I-LOADED, network base image loaded, version = 05.12.00
%DECnet-W-NOOPEN, could not open SYS$SYSROOT:[SYSEXE]NET$CONFIG.DAT
I logged a call with Compaq, and was reliably informed that, The loader for Decnet base image tries to load net$config.dat, but has a hardcoded file size limit of, I think, 128 blocks. My net$config.dat was larger than 128 blocks. I believe this problem occured on OpenVMS 7.3-1, I don't know if it is still an issue, but my point being that even Compaq/HP designed OS code which could not handle files over a specific hardcoded size.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-23-2005 02:20 AM
08-23-2005 02:20 AM
Re: Cluster size of large disks
The option set cluster size is available since open vms 7.2.
If you make the clustersize smaller you have to extent the indexf.sys manualy during the init, and you must probaly change your max files.
There is only 1 exception. If you restore a system disk you can not use backup/noinit because the disk wil not be a bootable disk after this action.
Or you could make partitions depents of you controler
If you make the clustersize smaller you have to extent the indexf.sys manualy during the init, and you must probaly change your max files.
There is only 1 exception. If you restore a system disk you can not use backup/noinit because the disk wil not be a bootable disk after this action.
Or you could make partitions depents of you controler
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-23-2005 02:31 AM
08-23-2005 02:31 AM
Re: Cluster size of large disks
Forgive me, but all that doesn't make sense to me:
> The option set cluster size is available since open vms 7.2.
That's the first release to support a BITMAP.SYS > 255 blocks.
I have been able to use INITIALIZE/CLUSTER for _many_, _many_ releases, at least V4.x.
> If you make the clustersize smaller you have to extent the indexf.sys...
Why? The storage allocation bitmap is in BITMAP.SYS, not INDEXF.
Maximum files is the size of the file header allocation bitmap in INDEXF.SYS.
> There is only 1 exception.
Again, I don't understand that. BACKUP is supposed to properly update the boot block if you use BACKUP/IMAGE
> The option set cluster size is available since open vms 7.2.
That's the first release to support a BITMAP.SYS > 255 blocks.
I have been able to use INITIALIZE/CLUSTER for _many_, _many_ releases, at least V4.x.
> If you make the clustersize smaller you have to extent the indexf.sys...
Why? The storage allocation bitmap is in BITMAP.SYS, not INDEXF.
Maximum files is the size of the file header allocation bitmap in INDEXF.SYS.
> There is only 1 exception.
Again, I don't understand that. BACKUP is supposed to properly update the boot block if you use BACKUP/IMAGE
.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-23-2005 02:44 AM
08-23-2005 02:44 AM
Re: Cluster size of large disks
BACKUP/NOINIT:
I am quite sure, that a copied systemdisks using BACKUP/IMAGE/NOINIT on order to change some relevant disk parameters and the new systemdisks booted perfectly (The /IMAGE is responsible for the correct backlinking... of VMS directories).
regards Kalle
I am quite sure, that a copied systemdisks using BACKUP/IMAGE/NOINIT on order to change some relevant disk parameters and the new systemdisks booted perfectly (The /IMAGE is responsible for the correct backlinking... of VMS directories).
regards Kalle
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP