- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: DEC LAT
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-15-2005 08:34 PM
03-15-2005 08:34 PM
I'm trying to analyse network traffic between a DEC repeater and a kilostream link without much luck.
The current setup is like this
DECSERVER 90m
| cat5
DECREPEATER
| cat5
DEC RouteAbout access E1
| x21
Kilsotream link
If we put a hub between the routeabout and the repeater we can't seem to sniff all the traffic with ethereal. All we get is a few spanning tree protocl messages (See attached, need ethereal to open).
We need a decent trace in order to work out if we can replace the kilostream with ADSL.
Any suggestions would be great on how to do this.
Thanks
Steve
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-16-2005 04:58 AM
03-16-2005 04:58 AM
SolutionWhat you could do is bring up the xDSL link and migrate to TCP/IP protocols. You'll need TCP/IP (or the older UCX) on the VMS host.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-16-2005 07:55 AM
03-16-2005 07:55 AM
Re: DEC LAT
I don't use Etherpeek, but I would check the Routeabout documentation carefully. Some protcol bridging products will only transfer some of the protcols present on the Ethernet link.
To be definitive, I would use a monitoring tool that captures bare packets (I carry around Etherpeek).
Hope that the above is helpful.
- Bob Gezelter, http://www.rlgsc.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-16-2005 07:41 PM
03-16-2005 07:41 PM
Re: DEC LAT
I was afraid this was the case. Thanks for your help.
Steve
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-20-2005 10:33 AM
03-20-2005 10:33 AM
Re: DEC LAT
There use to be a device called a TRANSLAN that would extend a LAN accross a WAN,
Tim