- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- EVA, VMS Blade and preferred paths
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-10-2010 11:49 AM
тАО02-10-2010 11:49 AM
I should be asking this of my HP Storage Expert, but he's already home for the evening and I have a nagging doubt in my head.
config:
Three EVA6400s with eight disk shelves each.
BL860c blade servers - two enclosures with three and one with eight.
SAN in between the hosts and the storage managed by others. Storage will be configured using Command View and Continuous Access will be doing replication between two of the EVAs.
OpenVMS 8.3-1H1 on all of the blades.
Question:
With VMS being able to do path switching, do I need/want to include a preferred path in the EVA config or should I just rely on VMS to pick a path and, if I don't like it, choose a different path?
With redundant paths between the controllers and no fibre connection between them, I'm suspecting that we should actually just leave VMS to manage it.
Any ideas please???
Steve
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-10-2010 12:55 PM
тАО02-10-2010 12:55 PM
SolutionAs you can see from the Help for "set preferred_path", this is usually used for MSCP served disks.
You could use this at boot time to mount your disks units using a specific path, you would need to have specific knowledge about the IO characteristics of the volume for your path choices to be even close to optimal.
The alternative would be to let the system select a path at boot time and then, if necessary, modify it later using the "set device /path=
Unless you have an extremely IO intensive system with specific "HOT" disks, I would recommend letting the system take care of it.
If you are using Virtual Connect (VC) in your enclosures, then you need to consider your VC SAN configuration to ensure the maximum number of redundant paths.
I would also comment that I am surprised that you are using CA for data replication when Volume Shadowing is both available and superior (assuming that you have the EOE license.) CA on EVA is not really synchronous, even when you specify synchronous. (it is basically asynchronous with a large journal file)
but that is just my opinion, it is of course a personal choice.
HTH
Dave.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-10-2010 12:58 PM
тАО02-10-2010 12:58 PM
Re: EVA, VMS Blade and preferred paths
Host based shadowing would be great, but I can't do that to DR systems that are a couple of hundred miles away and not clustered (the latency of the disks would be too high I fear.)
Steve
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-10-2010 01:05 PM
тАО02-10-2010 01:05 PM
Re: EVA, VMS Blade and preferred paths
Just be sure that you understand the limitations of CA on the EVA's! Dont get me wrong, I am a big fan of EVA storage, but I work at a location where there have been "issues".
Dave.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-10-2010 01:07 PM
тАО02-10-2010 01:07 PM
Re: EVA, VMS Blade and preferred paths
I have a basic SAN load-balancing discussion posted at:
http://labs.hoffmanlabs.com/node/1451
And generic DT advice: test the full CA path before you need the recovery.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-10-2010 01:16 PM
тАО02-10-2010 01:16 PM
Re: EVA, VMS Blade and preferred paths
I'm planning on collecting it when this new environment goes live, but the ancient VAX systems that we're running the apps on at the moment doesn't have anything like T4 on it and we're fairly constrained on what we can and can't install.
The SAN management contact that we have has experience of EVA, but none of VMS yet is telling me that he must have preferred controllers configured on the EVA for every LUN.
Steve
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-10-2010 01:25 PM
тАО02-10-2010 01:25 PM
Re: EVA, VMS Blade and preferred paths
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-10-2010 01:47 PM
тАО02-10-2010 01:47 PM
Re: EVA, VMS Blade and preferred paths
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-10-2010 03:49 PM
тАО02-10-2010 03:49 PM
Re: EVA, VMS Blade and preferred paths
T4 itself is effectively a reporting tool. The CPU-related information can be run directly.
I suggest that you install T4 on one of your Alpha/Itanium systems, and take a careful look at the batch job that collects statistics. It is straightforward to implement the MONTIOR/RECORD, even if the system is significantly behind on revisions.
The resulting data file can then be extracted and used with directly with the T4 analysis tools.
- Bob Gezelter, http://www.rlgsc.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-10-2010 08:15 PM
тАО02-10-2010 08:15 PM
Re: EVA, VMS Blade and preferred paths
---
Right -- there is no definition of "best".
There is, however, a definition of "worst". An MSCP path will only be automatically switched to if there are no other local paths.
In that case, as soon as a local path becomes available, multipath will automatically "fail back" to that newly-available local path.
Multipath will first try paths that are "connected" before any "non-connected" paths.
This is an older HSG/HSZ artifact from the dual controller setup, where a LUN would only be "connected" to one of the two controllers at a time. For the EVA's, with
active/active support, it's less of an issue, but I believe that there is still a distinction for a dual-controller setup, with a performance penalty on reads.
-- Rob