- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Lexical function
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2008 04:34 AM
09-10-2008 04:34 AM
How can i get Entry number of executing job by f$getqui function??
I know just job name.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2008 04:42 AM
09-10-2008 04:42 AM
Re: Lexical function
If you want to get the entry number of your currently executing job (from that job itself) then something like...
entry = f$getqui("display_job","entry_number",,"this_job")
If the job you're interested in is another job (not the process you're running in) then you would need to loop through the queues (or the specific queue if you know the queue name) then loop through the jobs in that queue and check for the specific job name you want. Once you find that job then you can get the entry number.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2008 04:57 AM
09-10-2008 04:57 AM
Re: Lexical function
Wim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2008 05:08 AM
09-10-2008 05:08 AM
Re: Lexical function
I'm interested in is another job.
And I know queue name, but I dont know how realize it. ((
Can you write some example?
2Wim Van den: I have just one job with this job_name
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2008 05:09 AM
09-10-2008 05:09 AM
Re: Lexical function
As was implied by the other posts, one must be careful as it is possible to have multiple jobs of the same name in the queues and/or executing at the same time (for either the same user or different users).
Only the entry number is unique, so long as the job exists. Entry numbers can be quickly recycled, so care is recommended.
- Bob Gezelter, http://www.rlgsc.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2008 05:16 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2008 05:28 AM
09-10-2008 05:28 AM
Re: Lexical function
Naively )
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2008 05:44 AM
09-10-2008 05:44 AM
Re: Lexical function
Wim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2008 05:55 AM
09-10-2008 05:55 AM
Re: Lexical function
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2008 06:08 AM
09-10-2008 06:08 AM
Re: Lexical function
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2008 06:08 AM
09-10-2008 06:08 AM
Re: Lexical function
Wim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2008 06:21 AM
09-10-2008 06:21 AM
Re: Lexical function
$ QNAME = F$GETQUI("DISPLAY_QUEUE","QUEUE_NAME","*","BATCH")
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-11-2008 05:10 AM
09-11-2008 05:10 AM
Re: Lexical function
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-12-2008 12:17 PM
09-12-2008 12:17 PM
Re: Lexical function
from your Forum Profile:
I have assigned points to 0 of 8 responses to my questions.
Maybe you can find some time to do some assigning?
http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/helptips.do?#33
Mind, I do NOT say you necessarily need to give lots of points. It is fully up to _YOU_ to decide how many. If you consider an answer is not deserving any points, you can also assign 0 ( = zero ) points, and then that answer will no longer be counted as unassigned.
Consider, that every poster took at least the trouble of posting for you!
To easily find your streams with unassigned points, click your own name somewhere.
This will bring up your profile.
Near the bottom of that page, under the caption "My Question(s)" you will find "questions or topics with unassigned points " Clicking that will give all, and only, your questions that still have unassigned postings.
Thanks on behalf of your Forum colleagues.
PS. nothing personal in this. I try to post it to everyone with this kind of assignment ratio in this forum.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-16-2008 11:32 PM
09-16-2008 11:32 PM