HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- NET$SERVER.LOG & High Image Activations
Operating System - OpenVMS
1827810
Members
1938
Online
109969
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-15-2005 03:54 AM
12-15-2005 03:54 AM
NET$SERVER.LOG & High Image Activations
Greetings,
Recently we had a problem whereby we ran out of disk space for a non-boot disk. This was due to one/more overblown net$server.log files. After we corrected the problem we kept getting the message 'file access was terminated with no bits to close'. Not to mention that the processes that were writing to the net$server.log had very high image activations (we're talking well over 150,000). The system is running with OpenVMS V7.2-3 DECnet over TCP/IP. Our disks are available via an EMC SAN (DMX). No recent significant system changes were made. Would/could a network problem cause this behavior?
Recently we had a problem whereby we ran out of disk space for a non-boot disk. This was due to one/more overblown net$server.log files. After we corrected the problem we kept getting the message 'file access was terminated with no bits to close'. Not to mention that the processes that were writing to the net$server.log had very high image activations (we're talking well over 150,000). The system is running with OpenVMS V7.2-3 DECnet over TCP/IP. Our disks are available via an EMC SAN (DMX). No recent significant system changes were made. Would/could a network problem cause this behavior?
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-15-2005 04:23 AM
12-15-2005 04:23 AM
Re: NET$SERVER.LOG & High Image Activations
Manny,
the message you've provided is probably not exactly correct. Do you refer to the following message at the end of the NET$SERVER.LOG file ?
File access was terminated with no bits set on close
This message would be normal and indicate DECnet remote file access (through FAL server object) to a file on your system. The file was closed with no specific file disposition bits set - this is normal. For an explanation, please see ATW note 8558:
http://h71000.www7.hp.com/wizard/wiz_8558.html
Do your big NET$SERVER.LOG files contain many file accesses and FAL image activations ? Every time a file is accessed via DECnet, FAL is started on the local node. You should see appropriate entries in the NET$SERVER.LOG file, indicating the remote node and process, from which the file access has been made.
If you define the FAL$LOG system-logical (e.g. DEF/SYS FAL$LOG 1), you can also see additional information about the files accessed etc.
There is an optimization in DECnet, which will reduce the no. of process creations. Once a FAL connection is terminated, the process will start the NET$SERVER image and change it's name to Server_nnnn. It will accept another DECnet-connection for the same user without having to create a new process. Once such a Server_nnnn process remains idle for NETSERVER$TIMEOUT seconds, it will exit and close the NET$SERVER.LOG file.
Please try to find out, which operations are being logged in those NET$SERVER.LOG files and whether they seem to be caused by normal application behaviour.
Volker.
the message you've provided is probably not exactly correct. Do you refer to the following message at the end of the NET$SERVER.LOG file ?
File access was terminated with no bits set on close
This message would be normal and indicate DECnet remote file access (through FAL server object) to a file on your system. The file was closed with no specific file disposition bits set - this is normal. For an explanation, please see ATW note 8558:
http://h71000.www7.hp.com/wizard/wiz_8558.html
Do your big NET$SERVER.LOG files contain many file accesses and FAL image activations ? Every time a file is accessed via DECnet, FAL is started on the local node. You should see appropriate entries in the NET$SERVER.LOG file, indicating the remote node and process, from which the file access has been made.
If you define the FAL$LOG system-logical (e.g. DEF/SYS FAL$LOG 1), you can also see additional information about the files accessed etc.
There is an optimization in DECnet, which will reduce the no. of process creations. Once a FAL connection is terminated, the process will start the NET$SERVER image and change it's name to Server_nnnn. It will accept another DECnet-connection for the same user without having to create a new process. Once such a Server_nnnn process remains idle for NETSERVER$TIMEOUT seconds, it will exit and close the NET$SERVER.LOG file.
Please try to find out, which operations are being logged in those NET$SERVER.LOG files and whether they seem to be caused by normal application behaviour.
Volker.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-15-2005 04:16 PM
12-15-2005 04:16 PM
Re: NET$SERVER.LOG & High Image Activations
Manny,
Was the disk space consumed primarily by one huge log file, or were there a number of log files that accumulated over time?
You may want to look at dcl.openvms.org and pick up a copy of BATCH_LOG_FILE_CLEANUP.COM.
If you make sure that the account the problem occurred in accesses this procedure under at least NETWORK mode you can make sure that there wont be a large number of log files building up.
Another question -- do you have netserver$timeout defined either system wide or group wide or for the username the network process is executing under? If so, what is it set to? Perhaps if it is set to a very large time interval you might want to set it to less than 1/2 of what it is now.
Robert
Was the disk space consumed primarily by one huge log file, or were there a number of log files that accumulated over time?
You may want to look at dcl.openvms.org and pick up a copy of BATCH_LOG_FILE_CLEANUP.COM.
If you make sure that the account the problem occurred in accesses this procedure under at least NETWORK mode you can make sure that there wont be a large number of log files building up.
Another question -- do you have netserver$timeout defined either system wide or group wide or for the username the network process is executing under? If so, what is it set to? Perhaps if it is set to a very large time interval you might want to set it to less than 1/2 of what it is now.
Robert
Master you were right about 1 thing -- the negotiations were SHORT!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-19-2005 06:46 AM
12-19-2005 06:46 AM
Re: NET$SERVER.LOG & High Image Activations
I want to thank the individuals who responded to my post.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP