- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: SQLite3 and locking
Operating System - OpenVMS
1757728
Members
2502
Online
108863
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-25-2010 07:54 AM
тАО03-25-2010 07:54 AM
Re: SQLite3 and locking
There are other discussions around the ITRC forums of folks that have been working with SQLite.
There are VMS-related comments in the SQLite source pool, and there are existing discussions of folks that have built SQLite on VMS available via Google. It appears that various fixes have been fed back into the SQLite source pool. (Dr Hipp is pretty good about this stuff, FWIW.)
Download the SQLite source pool. See if it builds.
If you're looking for a pre-built and pre-packaged download here, MySQL (which has those available) might be a better choice. (I don't know of a pre-built SQLite download.)
And please start your own thread.
There are VMS-related comments in the SQLite source pool, and there are existing discussions of folks that have built SQLite on VMS available via Google. It appears that various fixes have been fed back into the SQLite source pool. (Dr Hipp is pretty good about this stuff, FWIW.)
Download the SQLite source pool. See if it builds.
If you're looking for a pre-built and pre-packaged download here, MySQL (which has those available) might be a better choice. (I don't know of a pre-built SQLite download.)
And please start your own thread.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-25-2010 07:57 AM
тАО03-25-2010 07:57 AM
Re: SQLite3 and locking
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-26-2010 07:27 AM
тАО03-26-2010 07:27 AM
Re: SQLite3 and locking
We never got it to work well enough to deploy it. The locking issues indicated above were show-stoppers.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-26-2010 07:36 AM
тАО03-26-2010 07:36 AM
Re: SQLite3 and locking
Hm, re-reading the whole thread now, I seem to have reversed my earlier position.
I should have said ... we *could* have used it in some limited applications with file locking instead of record locking, as I indicated earlier, but record locking does remain a desirable feature. When we ran up against the record locking issues and learned that the VMS python project already took sqlite3 into their repository, we left off trying to solve it on our own. We've learned from past experience that we can't sustain this kind of project, so we had hoped the python project's code would continue to move along so that by the time we were ready to look into it again, we would just use their code.
I do not know the status of that code, however, as we haven't looked at any updates in many months.
I should have said ... we *could* have used it in some limited applications with file locking instead of record locking, as I indicated earlier, but record locking does remain a desirable feature. When we ran up against the record locking issues and learned that the VMS python project already took sqlite3 into their repository, we left off trying to solve it on our own. We've learned from past experience that we can't sustain this kind of project, so we had hoped the python project's code would continue to move along so that by the time we were ready to look into it again, we would just use their code.
I do not know the status of that code, however, as we haven't looked at any updates in many months.
- « Previous
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP