- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- SWS 1-3-1 - vs. 2.1-1
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-18-2006 12:08 AM
08-18-2006 12:08 AM
SWS 1-3-1 - vs. 2.1-1
We have our web-application running on diferrent machines running SWS (apache) 1.3-1, and part of this is creating dynamic output by URL http://
The paths has been defined in HTTPD.CONF:
DocumentRoot "/apache$common/ot"
Scriptalias path "/apache$common/ot/path"
and that works fine.
Now on another machine, I installed the web-application and SWS 2.1, and set up the server accoring the first mentioned machine:
DocumentRoot "/apache$common/ot"
Scriptalias path "/apache$common/ot/path"
So you would expect that URL URL http://
A second issue: both the static and dymanic content use a stylesheet:
.
SWS 1.3-1 has no problem with that, but 2.1-1 fails to recognize this. Again, the specification on the paths is equal between SWS 1.3-1 and 2.1-1. (I know that SWS 2.1 works fine as well here - from my own server)
Just two differences:
* on the SWS 1.3-1 machine, all files are owned by APACHE$WWW, and the root of the web application is fully within APCHE$COMMON.
* On the SWS 2.1-1 machine, all files are owned by another user but protection is W:RE on all files. Second, the webappliaction is stored separate, from the server, but the root-directory is alaised in APACHE$COMMON (SET FILE root.dir /ENTER=APACHE$COMMON:[000000]root.dir).
As far as I know, these two environments are now logically equal.
Both issues are quite annoying; we need to get this solved before we can test the whole application against VMS 8.2
OpenVMS Developer & System Manager
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-18-2006 06:41 PM
08-18-2006 06:41 PM
Re: SWS 1-3-1 - vs. 2.1-1
did you run after instalation apache$config.com? We upgrade from v 1.3 to v 2.1 and owner of files is apache$www.
PRC040> @sys$startup:APACHE$CONFIG.COM;
HP Secure Web Server for OpenVMS Alpha
[based on Apache]
This procedure helps you define the operating environment required to run the Secure Web Server on this system.
To operate successfully, the server processes must have read access to the installed files and read-write access to certain other files and directories. HP recommends that you use this procedure to set the owner UIC on the CSWS files and directories to match the server. You should do this each time the product is installed, but it only has to be done once for each installation on a cluster.
Set owner UIC on CSWS files? [YES]
Jirza
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-20-2006 07:57 PM
08-20-2006 07:57 PM
Re: SWS 1-3-1 - vs. 2.1-1
On other machines, we still use 1.3 or 1.3-1 and of course we ran the installtion script following all settings.
In this case however, we cannot do that since we run OSU and WASD as well (concurently) for testing purposes. So settting ownership to APACHE$WWW (or any server-specific user) is out of the question. Setting basic protection to W:RE would do, and proved to be sufficient. Since it's a closed LAN, we don't bother about server-specific ACE protection which would be preferrable.
OpenVMS Developer & System Manager
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-20-2006 08:07 PM
08-20-2006 08:07 PM
Re: SWS 1-3-1 - vs. 2.1-1
OpenVMS Developer & System Manager
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-20-2006 09:20 PM
08-20-2006 09:20 PM
Re: SWS 1-3-1 - vs. 2.1-1
.conf reads:
ScriptAlias /ot-cgi/bps "apache$root/ot/bps/cgi-bin/bps"
and should have been:
ScriptAlias /ot-cgi/bps/ "apache$common/ot/bps/cgi-bin/bps/"
and the directory should hold the same change.
Now it works - even without ".COM"
Remains the stylesheet problem...
OpenVMS Developer & System Manager
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-20-2006 11:21 PM
08-20-2006 11:21 PM
Re: SWS 1-3-1 - vs. 2.1-1
Solution is simple: remove the blank lines in the stylesheet. But this is just a work-around. I have asked a collegue that is more aquainted to the web standards and he confimed this behaviour is NON-STANDARD and so I would consider it a bug in SWS 2.1-1.
OpenVMS Developer & System Manager