- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: web-names conflict
Operating System - OpenVMS
1822543
Members
2651
Online
109642
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-08-2004 01:28 AM
тАО04-08-2004 01:28 AM
web-names conflict
Based on Robert Atkinson's problem?
I have a number of (name based) virtual hosts running under Apache (thanks to thos who helped me out with that!). From 'outside' the network, it's running nicely.
Yet - there IS a problem, I think thow to solve it but I'm uncertian of the consequences.
As said, multiple webs:
web1.domain.tld
web2.domain.tld
web3.domain.tld
All three in DNS, autoritive server is with my ISP, to 1 IP address.
Web1 relates to web2 as well, and web2 contains references to web3. all fully qualified, actually these webs could reside anywhere...
Next - a firewall, where all http traffic is directed to one internal IP - the server's (192.168.0.2)
On the Server (VMS box: VMS.inside.domain.tld), three virtual hosts, as above, listening to 192.168.0.2 AND to another address, .11,.12 end .13 respectively.
On the very same VMS box is a DNS server for the local network, zone inside.domain.tld. The router/firewall is defined as forwarder.
the problem:
Access to ANY of these webs by name is no problem - from OUTSIDE the firewall. From INSIDE te firewall however, it doesn't work. Quite obviously, since domain.tld refers to the outside of the firewall, and traffic will NEVER reach inside again IF taken from inside.
What I would do is define all webs - as specified above - in local DNS to point to 192,168.0.2 - the local VMS box where all webs reside. However: wouldn't that conflict with the spec at my ISP?
Is there another way to achive this, so I can test the webs - including the internal references - without having to open an outside line?
I have a number of (name based) virtual hosts running under Apache (thanks to thos who helped me out with that!). From 'outside' the network, it's running nicely.
Yet - there IS a problem, I think thow to solve it but I'm uncertian of the consequences.
As said, multiple webs:
web1.domain.tld
web2.domain.tld
web3.domain.tld
All three in DNS, autoritive server is with my ISP, to 1 IP address.
Web1 relates to web2 as well, and web2 contains references to web3. all fully qualified, actually these webs could reside anywhere...
Next - a firewall, where all http traffic is directed to one internal IP - the server's (192.168.0.2)
On the Server (VMS box: VMS.inside.domain.tld), three virtual hosts, as above, listening to 192.168.0.2 AND to another address, .11,.12 end .13 respectively.
On the very same VMS box is a DNS server for the local network, zone inside.domain.tld. The router/firewall is defined as forwarder.
the problem:
Access to ANY of these webs by name is no problem - from OUTSIDE the firewall. From INSIDE te firewall however, it doesn't work. Quite obviously, since domain.tld refers to the outside of the firewall, and traffic will NEVER reach inside again IF taken from inside.
What I would do is define all webs - as specified above - in local DNS to point to 192,168.0.2 - the local VMS box where all webs reside. However: wouldn't that conflict with the spec at my ISP?
Is there another way to achive this, so I can test the webs - including the internal references - without having to open an outside line?
Willem Grooters
OpenVMS Developer & System Manager
OpenVMS Developer & System Manager
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-13-2004 09:00 PM
тАО04-13-2004 09:00 PM
Re: web-names conflict
Willem,
DNS is a very tricky challenge.
Did I got this right:
From the outside web1.domain.tld does resolve to your FW adress. These requests are forwarded to your box.
From the inside you want to avoid outgoing traffic.
What you want to do now is to have a dual headed DNS setup. One being maintained by your ISP, one internal for security reasons.
Because there is no master-slave communication between your internal DNS and the ISP DNS there should be no conflict.
Question: How do your internal systems get DNS requests to the internet resolved? Or does your policy deny any request to the outside?
DNS is a very tricky challenge.
Did I got this right:
From the outside web1.domain.tld does resolve to your FW adress. These requests are forwarded to your box.
From the inside you want to avoid outgoing traffic.
What you want to do now is to have a dual headed DNS setup. One being maintained by your ISP, one internal for security reasons.
Because there is no master-slave communication between your internal DNS and the ISP DNS there should be no conflict.
Question: How do your internal systems get DNS requests to the internet resolved? Or does your policy deny any request to the outside?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-13-2004 09:48 PM
тАО04-13-2004 09:48 PM
Re: web-names conflict
Andreas,
Externally - that is: on the 'dirty' side of the firewall - my domain 'domain.tld' is in the ISP's DNS.
Internally I have my internal domain 'intra.domain.tld'. My VMS box is configured to be the primary DNS for this domain, configured as 'MASTER'.
My firewall has been configured as forwarder on my internal DNS, and the second DNS server in the intranet. It accepts DNS requests from the internal network only, and is NOT configured to be the SLAVE DNS, for either side. Just the caching-DNS for all machiens inside.
Externally - that is: on the 'dirty' side of the firewall - my domain 'domain.tld' is in the ISP's DNS.
Internally I have my internal domain 'intra.domain.tld'. My VMS box is configured to be the primary DNS for this domain, configured as 'MASTER'.
My firewall has been configured as forwarder on my internal DNS, and the second DNS server in the intranet. It accepts DNS requests from the internal network only, and is NOT configured to be the SLAVE DNS, for either side. Just the caching-DNS for all machiens inside.
Willem Grooters
OpenVMS Developer & System Manager
OpenVMS Developer & System Manager
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP