HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- >
- LAG and switch configuration
Operating System - Tru64 Unix
1827836
Members
1339
Online
109969
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-18-2008 07:52 PM
11-18-2008 07:52 PM
LAG and switch configuration
Funny, I see a similar question was just asked.
I'm trying, for the first time, to set up a LAG interface on 5.1B PK6 using two bcm interfaces. I believe I have the Tru64 config correct, with both interfaces unconfigured, then in /etc/inet.local:
lagconfig -c lag=lag0,key=1
lagconfig -p bcm0 key=1
lagconfig -p bcm1 key=1
ifconfig lag0 128.101.xxx.xxx netmask 255.255.254.0 up
and the lag0 interface comes up. But, no traffic, and very erratic (almost no) ping response.
I wonder what the switch config should be - I am assuming LAG == LACP, but I may be wrong? Switch is an HP Procurve 4108 with LACP configured on the ports. I tried both active and passive LACP but no joy - "show lacp" on the switch shows the interfaces up but no LACP peer. Should I have something else? I know LAG is a "subset" of 802.3ad, maybe the missing part is that Tru64 doesn't do the negotiation part of LACP? The switch will supports a "non protocol" trunk - worth trying?
All ports are set to auto-negotiate by the way, but it's unusual to use anything else for gigE ports...
Thanks for advice!
Graham
I'm trying, for the first time, to set up a LAG interface on 5.1B PK6 using two bcm interfaces. I believe I have the Tru64 config correct, with both interfaces unconfigured, then in /etc/inet.local:
lagconfig -c lag=lag0,key=1
lagconfig -p bcm0 key=1
lagconfig -p bcm1 key=1
ifconfig lag0 128.101.xxx.xxx netmask 255.255.254.0 up
and the lag0 interface comes up. But, no traffic, and very erratic (almost no) ping response.
I wonder what the switch config should be - I am assuming LAG == LACP, but I may be wrong? Switch is an HP Procurve 4108 with LACP configured on the ports. I tried both active and passive LACP but no joy - "show lacp" on the switch shows the interfaces up but no LACP peer. Should I have something else? I know LAG is a "subset" of 802.3ad, maybe the missing part is that Tru64 doesn't do the negotiation part of LACP? The switch will supports a "non protocol" trunk - worth trying?
All ports are set to auto-negotiate by the way, but it's unusual to use anything else for gigE ports...
Thanks for advice!
Graham
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-19-2008 12:57 PM
11-19-2008 12:57 PM
Re: LAG and switch configuration
It actually seems like I have a hardware problem! My test system is an ES40 with one DEGXA on each PCI bus. The one on the upper bus just registers errors ("netstat -i" output), and when I move it to the bottom bus it works fine.
"/sbin/hwmgr view hierarchy" extract:
1: platform AlphaServer ES40
2: cpu CPU0
3: cpu CPU1
4: cpu CPU2
5: cpu CPU3
9: bus pci1
10: connection pci1slot4
16: scsi_adapter itpsa0
17: scsi_bus scsi0
67: disk bus-0-targ-0-lun-0 dsk0
12: connection pci1slot5
75: network bcm2
14: connection pci1slot6
20: network bcm0
21: bus pci0
22: connection pci0slot1
34: graphics_controller comet0
24: connection pci0slot2
35: fibrechannel_adapter emx2
36: scsi_bus scsi2
Not sure if this is a documented limitation of DEGXA in ES40 model 1, or just a hardware fault in the PCI backplane. Now that I check, the DEGXA in our other ES40s is also on bus pci1, so I don't know if they simply don't work on pci0...
With both cards on the pci1 bus, the lag interface comes up. I still have the switch configured for LACP, and it doesn't show a trunk being negotiated, so I do still wonder if I should have a "non-protocol" trunk defined - but that does sound to me like the switch no longer uses 802.3ad at all...?
"/sbin/hwmgr view hierarchy" extract:
1: platform AlphaServer ES40
2: cpu CPU0
3: cpu CPU1
4: cpu CPU2
5: cpu CPU3
9: bus pci1
10: connection pci1slot4
16: scsi_adapter itpsa0
17: scsi_bus scsi0
67: disk bus-0-targ-0-lun-0 dsk0
12: connection pci1slot5
75: network bcm2
14: connection pci1slot6
20: network bcm0
21: bus pci0
22: connection pci0slot1
34: graphics_controller comet0
24: connection pci0slot2
35: fibrechannel_adapter emx2
36: scsi_bus scsi2
Not sure if this is a documented limitation of DEGXA in ES40 model 1, or just a hardware fault in the PCI backplane. Now that I check, the DEGXA in our other ES40s is also on bus pci1, so I don't know if they simply don't work on pci0...
With both cards on the pci1 bus, the lag interface comes up. I still have the switch configured for LACP, and it doesn't show a trunk being negotiated, so I do still wonder if I should have a "non-protocol" trunk defined - but that does sound to me like the switch no longer uses 802.3ad at all...?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-19-2008 05:50 PM
11-19-2008 05:50 PM
Re: LAG and switch configuration
Initial problem was a hardware issue - probably a bad pci backplane. Swapped cards and hard drive into a spare ES40 and all works.
Still curious about the optimum switch config.
Still curious about the optimum switch config.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP