HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- >
- Shared memory segment with 0 attaches
Operating System - Tru64 Unix
1828293
Members
2878
Online
109975
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-26-2006 05:15 AM
10-26-2006 05:15 AM
Hi,
I just run a sys_check on a 3-node Tru64 Cluster and found some messages similar to this one:
Operational: Shared memory segment with 0 attaches ( 5243056 ).
This is should be investigated. This may be normal, or may mean shared memory was not properly released.
I've been searching for some light on this but couldn't anything yet. What does this mean? (or better) is there any way to find out if that could be a performance issue?
Thanks in advance.
Juan
I just run a sys_check on a 3-node Tru64 Cluster and found some messages similar to this one:
Operational: Shared memory segment with 0 attaches ( 5243056 ).
This is should be investigated. This may be normal, or may mean shared memory was not properly released.
I've been searching for some light on this but couldn't anything yet. What does this mean? (or better) is there any way to find out if that could be a performance issue?
Thanks in advance.
Juan
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-26-2006 06:31 AM
10-26-2006 06:31 AM
Re: Shared memory segment with 0 attaches
Juan,
I get those messages all the time when I run sys_check. Check with the ipcs command like this:
# ipcs -bom
Shared Memory:
T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP NATTCH SEGSZ
m 0 0x435dce60 --rw-rw-rw- root system 1 8024
m 1 0x615d045c --rw------- root daemon 0 57776
The NATTCH column is the no. attached. I get the error message because of the 2nd one. Don't know why it's there, I simply ignore them.
Vic
Vic
I get those messages all the time when I run sys_check. Check with the ipcs command like this:
# ipcs -bom
Shared Memory:
T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP NATTCH SEGSZ
m 0 0x435dce60 --rw-rw-rw- root system 1 8024
m 1 0x615d045c --rw------- root daemon 0 57776
The NATTCH column is the no. attached. I get the error message because of the 2nd one. Don't know why it's there, I simply ignore them.
Vic
Vic
There are 10 kinds of people, one that understands binary and one that doesn't.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-26-2006 07:02 AM
10-26-2006 07:02 AM
Solution
Shared memory is used for process communications. Normally, databases make extensive use of shared memory.
When the database starts, or a process that uses shared memory start, it creates the shared memory segment. Normally, one or more process are attached to the shared memory segment to exchange information.
There could be the case, that a process creates a shared memory segment, but when it ends, does not closes the shared memory segment created. If is not used, then is consuming memory without needs.
You can view the CPID/LPID to identify the current and last process ID that used the shared memory segment. You can also identify the creator by looking at the CREATOR CGROUP fields.
When the database starts, or a process that uses shared memory start, it creates the shared memory segment. Normally, one or more process are attached to the shared memory segment to exchange information.
There could be the case, that a process creates a shared memory segment, but when it ends, does not closes the shared memory segment created. If is not used, then is consuming memory without needs.
You can view the CPID/LPID to identify the current and last process ID that used the shared memory segment. You can also identify the creator by looking at the CREATOR CGROUP fields.
Por que hacerlo dificil si es posible hacerlo facil? - Why do it the hard way, when you can do it the easy way?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-26-2006 08:01 AM
10-26-2006 08:01 AM
Re: Shared memory segment with 0 attaches
Fair enough, thank you both.
Juan
Juan
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP