- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
- >
- Active/Active Exchange 2000
ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
1821646
Members
2977
Online
109633
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-27-2002 04:00 PM
тАО04-27-2002 04:00 PM
Active/Active Exchange 2000
Hi. I've got the Compaq Cluster Training and it say's that active/active is possible with Exchange 2000 on the CL380 but it doesn't go into detail. How? Is there any way for each node to own it's own physical drive? I have two controllers. And, I did try setting the controllers to active/active, configuring one mirror set as one logical drive on host port 0 and a seperate mirror set as a logical drive on host port 1 (and a third mirror as my quorum on port 0) but the cluster never saw the second drive as a resource. Am I missing something?
Also, the book says to put the binaries on the shared drive while MS says to put them on each nodes C: drive. Again, the book doesn't go into detail on why. Why is that?
TIA,
Chris
Also, the book says to put the binaries on the shared drive while MS says to put them on each nodes C: drive. Again, the book doesn't go into detail on why. Why is that?
TIA,
Chris
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-28-2002 04:00 PM
тАО04-28-2002 04:00 PM
Re: Active/Active Exchange 2000
Also, I'm now noticing that occasionally my shared physical drive does not come online. The current setup has my quorum on one pair of mirrored drives, ID 2, controller 1, LUN 1, host port 0. This drive shows up in 2000 as logical drive q:\, Disk 0, Online and is configured as a basic disk. My other logical drive used for shared storage is 4 36gig drives in a raid 5, ID 2, LUN 2, controller 1, host port 0. In Windows 2000 the drive shows up as drive z:\, Disk 1, Online and configured as a basic disk.
The problem is that after a failover I can't see z:\ or q:\ in windows explorer. Windows 2000 Disk Management tells me that these drives are there, healthy, and online. The shares that are on these drives are available. But, the physical drives themselves are not accessible (error: z:\ is not accessible. The folder was moved or removed) from the machine which claims to own them, which means that any application (Compaq Veritas EBS) which installs itself on the physical mapping of the shared storage is now unavailable. The physical drive shows up in Cluster Manager as online. And, exchange 2000 still works.
Any ideas?
The problem is that after a failover I can't see z:\ or q:\ in windows explorer. Windows 2000 Disk Management tells me that these drives are there, healthy, and online. The shares that are on these drives are available. But, the physical drives themselves are not accessible (error: z:\ is not accessible. The folder was moved or removed) from the machine which claims to own them, which means that any application (Compaq Veritas EBS) which installs itself on the physical mapping of the shared storage is now unavailable. The physical drive shows up in Cluster Manager as online. And, exchange 2000 still works.
Any ideas?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-28-2002 04:00 PM
тАО04-28-2002 04:00 PM
Re: Active/Active Exchange 2000
Here are some answers regarding Exchange. We'll get back with you on the other questions as soon as we can.....
Q: Also, the book says to put the binaries on the shared drive while MS says to put them on each nodes C: drive. Again, the book doesn't go into detail on why. Why is that?
A: This question seems to deal with a difference between Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000. With Exchange 5.5 the application binaries are installed on the shared drives and with Exchange 2000, they are installed on the local drives. This comes from the differences between the clustering solutions. With Exchange 5.5, the solution is simply a failover solution and can only accommodate one instance running in a cluster. Exchange 2000 has dedicated cluster resources and only requires instance information on the shared drives, thus the ability to do active/active configurations.
Q: I've got the Compaq Cluster Training and it say's that active/active is possible with Exchange 2000 on the CL380 but it doesn't go into detail. How?
A: It is possible to have an active/active cluster configuration on the CL380. To do this, install Exchange 2000 on both nodes in the cluster. Second, create a virtual server that Exchange will use (i.e. a group with at least one disk resource, IP address, and network name). Lastly add a ?Microsoft Exchange System Attendant? Resource to the cluster group. By adding this resource, all of the required databases, log files, and directories are created on the disk in the virtual server. This is only possible with Exchange 2000, not 5.5.
Important note: Active/active Exchange configurations are not recommended by Microsoft. This is because of virtual memory fragmentation that occurs during the Exchange server operation. After a failover, it can not be guaranteed that each of the users can be reconnected to the Exchange server.
Q: Also, the book says to put the binaries on the shared drive while MS says to put them on each nodes C: drive. Again, the book doesn't go into detail on why. Why is that?
A: This question seems to deal with a difference between Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000. With Exchange 5.5 the application binaries are installed on the shared drives and with Exchange 2000, they are installed on the local drives. This comes from the differences between the clustering solutions. With Exchange 5.5, the solution is simply a failover solution and can only accommodate one instance running in a cluster. Exchange 2000 has dedicated cluster resources and only requires instance information on the shared drives, thus the ability to do active/active configurations.
Q: I've got the Compaq Cluster Training and it say's that active/active is possible with Exchange 2000 on the CL380 but it doesn't go into detail. How?
A: It is possible to have an active/active cluster configuration on the CL380. To do this, install Exchange 2000 on both nodes in the cluster. Second, create a virtual server that Exchange will use (i.e. a group with at least one disk resource, IP address, and network name). Lastly add a ?Microsoft Exchange System Attendant? Resource to the cluster group. By adding this resource, all of the required databases, log files, and directories are created on the disk in the virtual server. This is only possible with Exchange 2000, not 5.5.
Important note: Active/active Exchange configurations are not recommended by Microsoft. This is because of virtual memory fragmentation that occurs during the Exchange server operation. After a failover, it can not be guaranteed that each of the users can be reconnected to the Exchange server.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP