- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
- >
- Benefits of HP's proprietary & unbundled NIC / HBA...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-01-2013 08:07 PM
04-01-2013 08:07 PM
Benefits of HP's proprietary & unbundled NIC / HBA drives vs using the stock RHEL 6 ones?
I'm looking for informed thoughts on whether maintaining HP's HBA driver (hpsa?) and the various unbundled / proprietary NIC drivers on RHEL servers has a *tangible* benefit over the much-simpler strategy of just using the drivers bundled by Red Hat.
Servers are mostly DL300 G8 series, with a few DL380 G6, DL380 G7, and DL580 G7 systems. Onboard GE NIC's plus several flavors of PCI-e 10GE. HP Smart Array HBA's, the usual P410/P812/P420 etc. models.
Thanks.
- Tags:
- HBA
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-02-2013 07:54 AM
04-02-2013 07:54 AM
Re: Benefits of HP's proprietary & unbundled NIC / HBA drives vs using the stock RHEL 6 ones?
Whenever possible just use the inbox drivers. Use the HP drivers whenever there is an out of cycle release or bug fix that hasn't made it upstream for the distribution vendors to pickup. For drivers like hpvsa, the only choice is to use the HP driver
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-02-2013 04:52 PM
04-02-2013 04:52 PM
Re: Benefits of HP's proprietary & unbundled NIC / HBA drives vs using the stock RHEL 6 ones?
The only time we really recommend using drivers from HP.com is if your distro is old and the drivers are really out of date, or you need some specific hotfix in the latest driver that may not be available for a few months while waiting for the next build of the distro.
So Tangible benefit is simply the wait time for fixes to work their way through the normal channels is reduced and the ability to get newer drivers on older builds.
I work at HPE
HPE Support Center offers support for your HPE services and products when and how you need it. Get started with HPE Support Center today.
[Any personal opinions expressed are mine, and not official statements on behalf of Hewlett Packard Enterprise]

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-02-2013 11:40 PM
04-02-2013 11:40 PM
Re: Benefits of HP's proprietary & unbundled NIC / HBA drives vs using the stock RHEL 6 ones?
Interesting - thanks for the response. Some months ago I was prompted by one of the alert email digests (that used to go out for the dozens of products I nominally subscribe to) to check the hpsa driver bundled by Red Hat, which *appeared* to be rather old. I asked RH to update and they said it was in process. Perhaps their confusing practices wrt version numbering are at play, and what they ship is more up-to-date than it would seem.
At one point last year I went to update NIC firmware (NC523SFP I think) and found that the scexe bundle wouldn't / couldn't apply the update with the stock driver - I had to hunt down a source RPM for the HP proprietary driver and figure out how to build it into the kernel. ISTR later versions of the firmware update not needing those hoops, though.