- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
- >
- Re: by-passing RAID controller
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-13-2010 01:39 AM
05-13-2010 01:39 AM
by-passing RAID controller
Currently it is configure for RAID 0. There are 3 disks on the bay. First disk has the OS and two other disks were added later.
Can I remove the other two disks or the data could have spread across all the disks since it is configured for RAID 0.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-13-2010 02:25 AM
05-13-2010 02:25 AM
Re: by-passing RAID controller
If your current raid0 contains all 3 disks, yes the data is spread across all 3 disks, "it is striped", so you can not remove the 2 disks without destroying the 3-disk raid0 and creating one or more 1-disk raid0.
It looks you want individual disks in your OS level, but why? What are you after? Maybe it is doable with HW raid.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-13-2010 10:04 AM
05-13-2010 10:04 AM
Re: by-passing RAID controller
[root@www ~]# sfdisk -s
/dev/cciss/c0d0: 71652960
/dev/cciss/c0d1: 71652960
/dev/cciss/c0d2: 71652960
/dev/dm-0: 10485760
/dev/dm-1: 10485760
/dev/dm-2: 10485760
/dev/dm-3: 4194304
/dev/dm-4: 10485760
/dev/dm-5: 20971520
total: 282067744 blocks
[root@www ~]# cat /proc/partitions
major minor #blocks name
104 0 71652960 cciss/c0d0
104 1 204800 cciss/c0d0p1
104 2 71444480 cciss/c0d0p2
104 16 71652960 cciss/c0d1
104 32 71652960 cciss/c0d2
253 0 10485760 dm-0
253 1 10485760 dm-1
253 2 10485760 dm-2
253 3 4194304 dm-3
253 4 10485760 dm-4
253 5 20971520 dm-5
[root@www ~]# ll /dev/block/104:2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 2010-05-10 00:25 /dev/block/104:2 -> ../cciss/c0d0p2
[root@www ~]# mount
/dev/mapper/vg_visolve-lv_root on / type ext4 (rw)
proc on /proc type proc (rw)
sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw)
devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620)
tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw)
/dev/cciss/c0d0p1 on /boot type ext4 (rw)
/dev/mapper/vg_visolve-lv_home on /home type ext4 (rw)
/dev/mapper/vg_visolve-lv_usr on /usr type ext4 (rw)
/dev/mapper/vg_visolve-lv_var on /var type ext4 (rw)
/dev/mapper/vg_visolve-lv_data on /DATA type ext4 (rw)
none on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw)
sunrpc on /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs type rpc_pipefs (rw)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-13-2010 10:26 AM
05-13-2010 10:26 AM
Re: by-passing RAID controller
How many raid-0 arrays do you have? one or three?
If you have one raid0 array you need to check how many disks it has in it. See if you can check this in the raid controller bios when the server boots up.
I am guessing you want to use zfs for disk/filesystem right?
ACU is not available for Solaris if that's your OS. You might even lose some performance because of lack of drivers for the raid controller in this case.
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/proliantstorage/software-management/acumatrix/index.html
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-13-2010 10:27 PM
05-13-2010 10:27 PM
Re: by-passing RAID controller
There are 3 disks on the server.
First disk is partitioned into two. One for /boot and the other is sole member of the volume group which is then divided into logical volumes for /usr /var swap etc.
Now I want to use other 2 disks for backup. But the raid-0 thing is confusing a bit
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-14-2010 03:59 AM
05-14-2010 03:59 AM
Re: by-passing RAID controller
http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c00687518/c00687518.pdf
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-14-2010 05:43 AM
05-14-2010 05:43 AM
Re: by-passing RAID controller
I think you could just create an raid-0 array with only one disk.