- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
- >
- DL 380 G5 RAID 5 Slow
ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
1822472
Members
2621
Online
109642
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-30-2008 05:10 AM
тАО03-30-2008 05:10 AM
Re: DL 380 G5 RAID 5 Slow
Hello,
are you using NIC teaming? If yes, please disable the teaming for a test. Maybe the teaming is play you a raw deal (Transmit / Receive Loadbalancing).
The interesting fact is the read peformance: A RAID 5 with a lower read performance, then write performance, is really spooky. :)
Best regards,
Patrick
are you using NIC teaming? If yes, please disable the teaming for a test. Maybe the teaming is play you a raw deal (Transmit / Receive Loadbalancing).
The interesting fact is the read peformance: A RAID 5 with a lower read performance, then write performance, is really spooky. :)
Best regards,
Patrick
Best regards,
Patrick
Patrick
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-30-2008 08:36 AM
тАО03-30-2008 08:36 AM
Re: DL 380 G5 RAID 5 Slow
I have disabled to Team on a spare server and just enabled one NIC. I get the same throughput.
I think this is NIC related though. I have tried all the Drivers apart from the Broadcom driver as I couldnt install it for some reason.
I will try to download and install again.
Thanks
I think this is NIC related though. I have tried all the Drivers apart from the Broadcom driver as I couldnt install it for some reason.
I will try to download and install again.
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-26-2008 12:03 AM
тАО06-26-2008 12:03 AM
Re: DL 380 G5 RAID 5 Slow
Hi Chris!
I have installed a Hp DL360 G5 p400 256 mb controller using firmware 2.08 which also is painfully slow!!
I have installed W2k3 x64 SQL server 2005 x64
I have 6 gb ram installed and a Raid5 with 4 discs. all discs are SAS 146 GB 10krpm
Im aware that one logical disk raid5 is not the way to go but we need the discspace and budget forced us to this machine.
To unpack a *.bak file ( rar lowest pack rate ) packed file size 6 gb unpack 40 gb ( one database ) took about 3├В┬╜ h. tested the same file at home with an areca 1220 controller raid5 8 discs ( though its sataI discs 250 gbs ) and made it in 14 minutes.
from what I can see that you have done so far you havent got any speed yet.
Is this a wellknown issue with this controller ?
I will keep googling and post here if I find anything usefull.
Kind regards Erik
I have installed a Hp DL360 G5 p400 256 mb controller using firmware 2.08 which also is painfully slow!!
I have installed W2k3 x64 SQL server 2005 x64
I have 6 gb ram installed and a Raid5 with 4 discs. all discs are SAS 146 GB 10krpm
Im aware that one logical disk raid5 is not the way to go but we need the discspace and budget forced us to this machine.
To unpack a *.bak file ( rar lowest pack rate ) packed file size 6 gb unpack 40 gb ( one database ) took about 3├В┬╜ h. tested the same file at home with an areca 1220 controller raid5 8 discs ( though its sataI discs 250 gbs ) and made it in 14 minutes.
from what I can see that you have done so far you havent got any speed yet.
Is this a wellknown issue with this controller ?
I will keep googling and post here if I find anything usefull.
Kind regards Erik
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-11-2008 02:24 PM
тАО07-11-2008 02:24 PM
Re: DL 380 G5 RAID 5 Slow
Hi
I was just about to put this into the business forum when I found this post, so im going to post it both forums.
I have a DL380 G5 with the Smart Array P400. New to this hardware sestup, so if you need more info let me know. Its running Windows 2003 64bit Enterprise (32Gb RAM). The current driver and firmwares versions are as follows:
SA P400 Win Driver : 6.8.0.64
SA P400 firmware : 4.06
DG146ABAB4 firmware : HPD7
I have 8 DG146ABAB4 drives installed. 3 Logical disk setup 2 logical drives mirrored, and a 3rd RAID 5. The controllers accelerator status is:
ACCELERATOR STATUS:
Logical Drive Disable Map: 0x00000000
Read Cache Size: 52 MBytes
Posted Write Size: 156 MBytes
Disable Flag: 0x00
Status: 0x00000001
Disable Code: 0x0000
Total Memory Size: 256 MBytes
Battery Count: 1
Battery Status: 0x0001
Parity Read Errors: 0000
Parity Write Errors: 0000
Error Log: N/A
Failed Batteries: 0x0000
Board Present: Yes
Accelerator Failure Map: 0x00000000
Max Error Log Entries: 12
NVRAM Load Status: 0x00
Memory Size Shift Factor: 0x0a
Non Battery Backed Memory: 0 MBytes
Memory State: 0x00
The drives dont have their indivudal write caches enabled.
So the odd behaviour im seeing and I just wanted to check if this was normal, as it seems really odd to me. I wrote a simple program just to check disk speed in writting data to the disk after noticing what i thought was slow app disk writes. The program create a 1GB file writting blocks of bytes at a fixed size per run. If the block size is close to 64KB (2^16 bytes) I get speeds up to 1300MB/s. If it writes blocks below that threshold its drop, so at 10KB block size its achieving 600MB/s (still generating a 1GB file). This I can understand and im ok with as it requires more writes).
However pushing the block size up to 200KB I only get 220MB/s max sometimes as slow as 90MB/s. Going above this its consitently slower. The average seems to be about 120MB/s when im writing blocks of 1MB at a time.
My question why on earth does it achieve such slow rates when pushing larger blocks of data at it.
Tony
I was just about to put this into the business forum when I found this post, so im going to post it both forums.
I have a DL380 G5 with the Smart Array P400. New to this hardware sestup, so if you need more info let me know. Its running Windows 2003 64bit Enterprise (32Gb RAM). The current driver and firmwares versions are as follows:
SA P400 Win Driver : 6.8.0.64
SA P400 firmware : 4.06
DG146ABAB4 firmware : HPD7
I have 8 DG146ABAB4 drives installed. 3 Logical disk setup 2 logical drives mirrored, and a 3rd RAID 5. The controllers accelerator status is:
ACCELERATOR STATUS:
Logical Drive Disable Map: 0x00000000
Read Cache Size: 52 MBytes
Posted Write Size: 156 MBytes
Disable Flag: 0x00
Status: 0x00000001
Disable Code: 0x0000
Total Memory Size: 256 MBytes
Battery Count: 1
Battery Status: 0x0001
Parity Read Errors: 0000
Parity Write Errors: 0000
Error Log: N/A
Failed Batteries: 0x0000
Board Present: Yes
Accelerator Failure Map: 0x00000000
Max Error Log Entries: 12
NVRAM Load Status: 0x00
Memory Size Shift Factor: 0x0a
Non Battery Backed Memory: 0 MBytes
Memory State: 0x00
The drives dont have their indivudal write caches enabled.
So the odd behaviour im seeing and I just wanted to check if this was normal, as it seems really odd to me. I wrote a simple program just to check disk speed in writting data to the disk after noticing what i thought was slow app disk writes. The program create a 1GB file writting blocks of bytes at a fixed size per run. If the block size is close to 64KB (2^16 bytes) I get speeds up to 1300MB/s. If it writes blocks below that threshold its drop, so at 10KB block size its achieving 600MB/s (still generating a 1GB file). This I can understand and im ok with as it requires more writes).
However pushing the block size up to 200KB I only get 220MB/s max sometimes as slow as 90MB/s. Going above this its consitently slower. The average seems to be about 120MB/s when im writing blocks of 1MB at a time.
My question why on earth does it achieve such slow rates when pushing larger blocks of data at it.
Tony
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP