- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
- >
- HP Ml350 g6 410i raid config with 8 600gb drives
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-09-2015 11:45 AM
02-09-2015 11:45 AM
HP Ml350 g6 410i raid config with 8 600gb drives
Looking for some advice on configuring an ML350 G6 with the 410i on-board controller. The machine is being built with new SAS drives of 600GB capacity. We have 8 drives available (had 8 300GB drives but the dataset to be transferred is really large - 150GB from 75GB within 1-1.25 years.) So we picked up some bigger new drives to hopefully last a couple years longer before we upgrade again. However, after running the ACU with a std. RAID 5 array config (w/512bit) using all 6 drives and saving the other 2 for spares (not sure if we want to use them for hotswap or not yet), we realized that we couldn't use the full space of the 6 drives (>2TBs).
We wanted to use the extra arms to get a little better performance since there's about 30 or so individuals hitting the DB and on the older server with 4 drives, it gets slow. Maybe we should just go back to the 300 GB drives to fit under the 2TB limitation and retain a simpler, easier to manage RAID config?
So any ideas or suggestions are welcome. Thanks in advance!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-09-2015 11:50 AM
02-09-2015 11:50 AM
Re: HP Ml350 g6 410i raid config with 8 600gb drives
Maybe create the array like you've mentioned and then create 2 logical drives withing the array. A small logical drive for the OS and related logs and a large logical drive to contain the database
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-09-2015 12:18 PM
02-09-2015 12:18 PM
Re: HP Ml350 g6 410i raid config with 8 600gb drives
So you're proposing that we run the ACU but instead of making the full 6 drive array as 1 flat space (6 X 600GB in RAID5), to make 1 logical drive for the OS, etc. (ie, a 500-600 GB logical drive as an example) and another logical drive (with the rest of the space, ~ 1.8TB roughly).
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-09-2015 12:24 PM
02-09-2015 12:24 PM
Re: HP Ml350 g6 410i raid config with 8 600gb drives
@bruce shaw wrote:So you're proposing that we run the ACU but instead of making the full 6 drive array as 1 flat space (6 X 600GB in RAID5), to make 1 logical drive for the OS, etc. (ie, a 500-600 GB logical drive as an example) and another logical drive (with the rest of the space, ~ 1.8TB roughly).
YeYes, that is what I'm suggesting