- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- Server Management - Systems Insight Manager
- >
- Re: VCRM is very poor
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-21-2004 04:12 PM
01-21-2004 04:12 PM
VCRM is very poor
Server Models, Operating system, and language that I want to get downloads for.
I have to manually go through and clean out all the crap it downloads. A royal pain.
I'm also unimpressed with how uninformative the VC agent is. I pushed out the two January network driver updates, but I can't see anywhere that I tell in SIM what machines do or don't have the update. They aren't listed on the VCA page.
The VCA page also tends to show duplicate items, or items with no version numbers.
Their version of version control is very far from useful in the enterprise. Am I the only one that wants accurate data across the enterprise?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-22-2004 12:22 AM
01-22-2004 12:22 AM
Re: VCRM is very poor
I think if you want you can download each update one at a time for each server and OS you have. Why would you want to do that if the PSP contains all of them? How many different servers are you managing? Personally I like that I only have one download to worry about.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-22-2004 02:27 AM
01-22-2004 02:27 AM
Re: VCRM is very poor
I also don't want a bazillion firmware images for servers I don't have, nor languages I'll never need, or operating systems that I don't have.
HP's approach seems to be 'flood the user with everything' and let them manually delete the junk they don't want.
PSPs aren't an issue with me...I don't care if they have drivers for hardware I don't have. But all of the non-PSP packages that are for hardware, OSes, and lanugages that I don't have drives me up the wall, trying to keep the repository clean.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-22-2004 03:14 AM
01-22-2004 03:14 AM
Re: VCRM is very poor
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-22-2004 03:24 AM
01-22-2004 03:24 AM
Re: VCRM is very poor
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-22-2004 08:18 AM
01-22-2004 08:18 AM
Re: VCRM is very poor
Create a directory structure that has subdirectories for the softpaqs and then separate areas for additional drivers etc.
Download what you need.
Subscribe to the Advisories from HP.
This way you know when appropriate material is available and can download it as required.
Also, you can choose not to validate against a softpaq, at this point the VCA then gives an overall indication based on available software rather than the reference paq.
This would pick up the NIC update you noted.
Yes, some components do not have version numbers in the software available columns, I believe this is due to the fact they're sub-components of a product.
I don't see double entries on any Servers running the latest Agents.
All this for free, if you want a better Product Management System then you'll need to look at the market. If only being able to manage the MS software / patches was this easy and free!