Ready to Build Dynamic Sites Without Drowning in JavaScript? Meet htmx

[DipanshuKr]

Let’s be real: modern frontend development can feel… overwhelming.

You just want to make a website a bit dynamic—maybe load some data without refreshing the page or swap in new content on a button click. But suddenly, you're knee-deep in React or Vue, wrangling props, state, bundlers, and build pipelines for something that should’ve taken 10 lines of code.

That’s where htmx comes in—and it’s a breath of fresh air.

---

So, What Exactly Is htmx?
htmx is a tiny JavaScript library (~10KB) that lets you build dynamic, modern web experiences using just HTML. No fancy frameworks. No compiling. No “hook fatigue.”

It works by giving you special HTML attributes—like hx-get, hx-post, hx-swap, and hx-trigger—that let you send requests to the server and update parts of your page without writing a single line of JavaScript.

Here's a taste:

<button hx-get="/hello" hx-target="#greeting" hx-swap="innerHTML">
  Say Hello
</button>

<div id="greeting"></div>

Click the button, and it fetches content from /hello and drops it inside the #greeting div. No JS event listeners. No component tree. Just HTML that does stuff. 

---

How Does htmx Compare to React, Vue, and Friends?

Let’s not pretend htmx is a drop-in replacement for every JavaScript framework. It's not trying to be. But depending on your project, it might be exactly what you need—and nothing you don’t.

Feature Comparison: htmx vs React/Vue/Angular 

---

Rendering

• htmx: Relies on server-side rendering — the server sends back HTML fragments.

• React/Vue/Angular: Primarily client-side rendering, though server-side rendering is possible with extra setup.

JavaScript Size

• htmx: Extremely lightweight at around 10KB.

• React/Vue/Angular: Much heavier — anywhere from 100KB to over 1MB, depending on the app.

Setup

• htmx: Simple — just add a <script> tag and start enhancing your HTML.

• React/Vue/Angular: Requires build tools, bundlers, configuration, and often a lot of boilerplate.

Learning Curve

• htmx: Very approachable — you mostly write plain HTML.

• React/Vue/Angular: Has a moderate to steep learning curve due to JSX/templates, state management, and tooling.

SEO

• htmx: Excellent by default since it's server-rendered.

• React/Vue/Angular: Needs special handling like server-side rendering (SSR) or pre-rendering for SEO.

State Management

• htmx: Delegates state to the server, keeping the frontend simple.

• React/Vue/Angular: Often needs external state libraries (e.g., Redux, Vuex) for complex state.

Best Use Cases

• htmx: Perfect for CRUD apps, dashboards, content-heavy sites, or enhancing legacy apps.

• React/Vue/Angular: Ideal for single-page apps (SPAs), real-time features, or apps with complex interactions.

---

When You’d Reach for htmx:

• You want to build something fast and keep it simple.

• Your app doesn’t need complex client-side logic.

• You're already comfortable with your backend and just want to enhance your frontend.

---

Why People (Including Me) Love htmx

No Build Tools. At All

Just add this to your HTML and you're in business:

<script src="https://unpkg.com/htmx.org"></script>​

No npm install, no Webpack config, no fiddling with Vite. It's the web, the way it used to be.

Keep Your Server in the Driver’s Seat

If you're using something like Django, Rails, Laravel, or even PHP—htmx plays really well with that. You just return HTML from your routes and htmx takes care of the rest.

It's almost nostalgic—but in a good way.

Learning Curve? Basically None

If you know HTML, you already know 80% of htmx. There’s no virtual DOM, no components, no lifecycle methods. It’s just declarative markup that makes your pages dynamic.

Less JavaScript, Fewer Headaches

How many bugs in your app are caused by frontend state going out of sync with the server? htmx avoids that entirely. Your server is the source of truth. Always.

---

But… Is It Enough for Real Projects?

Yes. In fact, htmx is already in production in a lot of places. But, like any tool, it has its limits.

You probably shouldn't use htmx if you're building:

• A real-time chat app

• A very interactive SPA with complex client-side state

• Something that needs offline functionality

For those cases, a client-heavy framework like React or Svelte makes more sense.

But for CRUD apps, admin panels, dashboards, content sites, or even hybrid apps, htmx can absolutely shine—and save you a ton of time.

---

htmx + Alpine.js

If you ever do need a bit of client-side behavior (like toggling tabs or dropdowns), htmx plays nicely with tools like Alpine.js. Think of Alpine as “Tailwind for interactivity”—small, scoped, and made to sprinkle.

Together, they make a great pair.

---

Final Thoughts

Look, I’m not here to bash React or Vue. They’re amazing tools when used in the right context. But not every project needs that much abstraction—or that much JavaScript.

htmx is a reminder that the web can be powerful without being complicated.

It brings back a bit of that old-school server-rendered magic but with modern capabilities—AJAX, dynamic swapping, progressive enhancement—baked in.

So the next time you're about to spin up a new React project just to handle a few form submissions or toggle some UI, stop and ask yourself:

Do I actually need all this JavaScript?

If the answer’s “probably not,” htmx might be exactly what you’re looking for.

---

Dipanshu Kumar

Hewlett Packard Enterprise (PSD-GCC)